Difference between revisions of "Auer2014b"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Peter Auer; |Title=Syntactic Structures and their Symbiotic Guests: Notes on Analepsis from the Perspective of On-Line Syntax |Tag(s)=I...") |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 04:22, 3 January 2018
| Auer2014b | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Auer2014b |
| Author(s) | Peter Auer |
| Title | Syntactic Structures and their Symbiotic Guests: Notes on Analepsis from the Perspective of On-Line Syntax |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | IL, Analepsis, On-line syntax, Structural latency |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2014 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Pragmatics |
| Volume | 24 |
| Number | 3 |
| Pages | 533-560 |
| URL | |
| DOI | |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
The empirical focus of this paper is on utterances that re-use syntactic structures from a preceding syntactic unit. Next utterances of this type are usually treated as (coordination) ellipsis. It is argued that from an on-line perspective on spoken syntax, they are better described as structural latency: A grammatical structure already established remains available and can therefore be made use of with one or more of its slots being filled by new material. A variety of cases of this particular kind of conversational symbiosis are discussed. It is argued that they should receive a common treatment. A number of features of the general host/guest relationship are discussed.
Notes
