Difference between revisions of "Heritage1998"
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=John Heritage; |Title=Oh-prefaced responses to inquiry |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; Particle; Oh; |Key=Heritage1998 |Year=1998...") |
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| − | |Author(s)=John Heritage; | + | |Author(s)=John Heritage; |
|Title=Oh-prefaced responses to inquiry | |Title=Oh-prefaced responses to inquiry | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; Particle; Oh; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; Particle; Oh; English; utterance design; |
|Key=Heritage1998 | |Key=Heritage1998 | ||
|Year=1998 | |Year=1998 | ||
| + | |Language=English | ||
|Journal=Language in Society | |Journal=Language in Society | ||
|Volume=27 | |Volume=27 | ||
|Pages=291-334 | |Pages=291-334 | ||
|URL=http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=4184540&fileId=S0047404500019990 | |URL=http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=4184540&fileId=S0047404500019990 | ||
| − | |DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500019990 | + | |DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500019990 |
|Abstract=n responses to English questions, prefacing with the particle oh indicates that, from the viewpoint of the answerer, a question is problematic in terms of its relevance, presuppositions, or context. In addition, oh-prefacing is used to foreshadow reluctance to advance the conversational topic invoked by a question; it may also be part of a “trouble-premonitory” response to various types of How are you inquiries in conversational openings and elsewhere. (Conversation analysis, English, utterance design, particles.) | |Abstract=n responses to English questions, prefacing with the particle oh indicates that, from the viewpoint of the answerer, a question is problematic in terms of its relevance, presuppositions, or context. In addition, oh-prefacing is used to foreshadow reluctance to advance the conversational topic invoked by a question; it may also be part of a “trouble-premonitory” response to various types of How are you inquiries in conversational openings and elsewhere. (Conversation analysis, English, utterance design, particles.) | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 01:30, 11 November 2017
| Heritage1998 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Heritage1998 |
| Author(s) | John Heritage |
| Title | Oh-prefaced responses to inquiry |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Conversation Analysis, Particle, Oh, English, utterance design |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 1998 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Language in Society |
| Volume | 27 |
| Number | |
| Pages | 291-334 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500019990 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
n responses to English questions, prefacing with the particle oh indicates that, from the viewpoint of the answerer, a question is problematic in terms of its relevance, presuppositions, or context. In addition, oh-prefacing is used to foreshadow reluctance to advance the conversational topic invoked by a question; it may also be part of a “trouble-premonitory” response to various types of How are you inquiries in conversational openings and elsewhere. (Conversation analysis, English, utterance design, particles.)
Notes
