Difference between revisions of "Bovet2011"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 2: Line 2:
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|Author(s)=Alain Bovet; Andrew P. Carlin; Philippe Sormani;
 
|Author(s)=Alain Bovet; Andrew P. Carlin; Philippe Sormani;
|Title=Discovery starts here? The 'Pulsar paper', thirty years on - an ethno-bibliometric note
+
|Title=Discovery starts here? The 'Pulsar paper', thirty years on an ethno-bibliometric note
 
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Ethnomethodology; Discovery; Bibliometrics;
 
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Ethnomethodology; Discovery; Bibliometrics;
 
|Key=Bovet2011
 
|Key=Bovet2011

Revision as of 01:22, 2 October 2017

Bovet2011
BibType ARTICLE
Key Bovet2011
Author(s) Alain Bovet, Andrew P. Carlin, Philippe Sormani
Title Discovery starts here? The 'Pulsar paper', thirty years on – an ethno-bibliometric note
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Ethnomethodology, Discovery, Bibliometrics
Publisher
Year 2011
Language
City
Month
Journal Ethnographic Studies
Volume 12
Number
Pages 126–139
URL Link
DOI
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

The “pulsar paper” was published 30 years ago. The anniversary of an important text frequently provides an opportunity to assess or, at least, appreciate its academic influence. In the limited scope of this note, we cannot hope to offer a review article. Instead we would like to reflect upon what such a review or appraisal may mean and amount to, especially against the background of a parallel development in the period considered: the rise of evaluative bibliometrics via citation counts, rather than sustained reading, as a distinct set of procedures for assessing, by way of proxy, the academic influence of a text, thus identifiable as a “Citation Classic®”

Notes