Difference between revisions of "Seuren-Huiskes2017"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Lucas M. Seuren; Mike Huiskes; |Title=Confirmation or Elaboration: What Do Yes/No Declaratives Want?, |Tag(s)=EMCA; Confirmation request...") |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 04:42, 11 August 2017
| Seuren-Huiskes2017 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Seuren-Huiskes2017 |
| Author(s) | Lucas M. Seuren, Mike Huiskes |
| Title | Confirmation or Elaboration: What Do Yes/No Declaratives Want?, |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Confirmation requests, Elaboration, Dutch |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2017 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Research on Language & Social Interaction |
| Volume | 50 |
| Number | 2 |
| Pages | 188-205 |
| URL | |
| DOI | 10.1080/08351813.2017.1301307 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Recent analyses have argued that when requests for confirmation are implemented with declarative word order, they are closure-implicative due to the relatively knowing stance indexed with the declarative. This article demonstrates, however, that in some cases participants show an orientation to both confirmation and elaboration as a relevant next action. By comparing requests for confirmation that are closure-implicative to those that are expansion-implicative, it is argued that in addition to epis- temic stance, participants also orient to the lexical design features and sequential placement of these declarative yes/no-type initiating actions to determine the relevant type of response. Data are in Dutch with English translations.
Notes
