Difference between revisions of "Schopf2016"
ElliottHoey (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Andrea C. Schöpf; Gillian S. Martin; Mary A. Keating |Title=Humor as a Communication Strategy in Provider–Patient Communication in a...") |
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) m |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Author(s)=Andrea C. Schöpf; Gillian S. Martin; Mary A. Keating | |Author(s)=Andrea C. Schöpf; Gillian S. Martin; Mary A. Keating | ||
|Title=Humor as a Communication Strategy in Provider–Patient Communication in a Chronic Care Setting | |Title=Humor as a Communication Strategy in Provider–Patient Communication in a Chronic Care Setting | ||
− | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Medical; Diabetes; Humour; Chronic illness; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Medical; Diabetes; Humour; Chronic illness; communication; conversation analysis; Europe / Europeans; humor; illness and disease; chronic; research; mixed methods; Qualitative methods; |
|Key=Schopf2016 | |Key=Schopf2016 | ||
|Year=2016 | |Year=2016 | ||
|Journal=Qualitative Health Research | |Journal=Qualitative Health Research | ||
+ | |Volume=27 | ||
+ | |Number=3 | ||
+ | |Pages=374-390 | ||
|URL=http://qhr.sagepub.com/content/early/2015/12/29/1049732315620773.abstract | |URL=http://qhr.sagepub.com/content/early/2015/12/29/1049732315620773.abstract | ||
− | |DOI= Andrea C. Schöpf1⇑ Gillian S. Martin1 Mary A. Keating1 1Trinity College Dublin, the University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland Andrea C. Schöpf, Institute for Quality Management and Social Medicine, Medical Center- University of Freiburg, Engelbergerstrasse 21, 79106 Freiburg, Germany. Email: andrea.schoepf@uniklinik-freiburg.de Abstract Humor is a potential communication strategy to accomplish various and potentially conflicting consultation goals. We investigated humor use and its reception in diabetes consultations by analyzing how and why humor emerges and its impact on the interaction. We did this by using an interactional sociolinguistics approach. We recorded 50 consultations in an Irish diabetes setting. Analysis of the humor events drew on framework analysis and on concepts from Conversation Analysis and pragmatics. The study also comprised interviews using tape-assisted recall. We identified 10 humor functions and two umbrella functions. A key finding is that most humor is relationship-protecting humor initiated by patients, that is, they voice serious messages and deal with emotional issues through humor. Our findings imply that patients’ and providers’ awareness of indirect communication strategies needs to be increased. We also recommend that researchers employ varied methods to adequately capture the interactive nature of humor. communication, medical conversation analysis diabetes Europe / Europeans humor illness and disease, chronic research, mixed methods qualitative This Article Published online before print December 30, 2015, doi: 10.1177/1049732315620773 | + | |DOI=Andrea C. Schöpf1⇑ Gillian S. Martin1 Mary A. Keating1 1Trinity College Dublin, the University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland Andrea C. Schöpf, Institute for Quality Management and Social Medicine, Medical Center- University of Freiburg, Engelbergerstrasse 21, 79106 Freiburg, Germany. Email: andrea.schoepf@uniklinik-freiburg.de Abstract Humor is a potential communication strategy to accomplish various and potentially conflicting consultation goals. We investigated humor use and its reception in diabetes consultations by analyzing how and why humor emerges and its impact on the interaction. We did this by using an interactional sociolinguistics approach. We recorded 50 consultations in an Irish diabetes setting. Analysis of the humor events drew on framework analysis and on concepts from Conversation Analysis and pragmatics. The study also comprised interviews using tape-assisted recall. We identified 10 humor functions and two umbrella functions. A key finding is that most humor is relationship-protecting humor initiated by patients, that is, they voice serious messages and deal with emotional issues through humor. Our findings imply that patients’ and providers’ awareness of indirect communication strategies needs to be increased. We also recommend that researchers employ varied methods to adequately capture the interactive nature of humor. communication, medical conversation analysis diabetes Europe / Europeans humor illness and disease, chronic research, mixed methods qualitative This Article Published online before print December 30, 2015, doi: 10.1177/1049732315620773 |
− | |||
|Abstract=Humor is a potential communication strategy to accomplish various and potentially conflicting consultation goals. We investigated humor use and its reception in diabetes consultations by analyzing how and why humor emerges and its impact on the interaction. We did this by using an interactional sociolinguistics approach. We recorded 50 consultations in an Irish diabetes setting. Analysis of the humor events drew on framework analysis and on concepts from Conversation Analysis and pragmatics. The study also comprised interviews using tape-assisted recall. We identified 10 humor functions and two umbrella functions. A key finding is that most humor is relationship-protecting humor initiated by patients, that is, they voice serious messages and deal with emotional issues through humor. Our findings imply that patients’ and providers’ awareness of indirect communication strategies needs to be increased. We also recommend that researchers employ varied methods to adequately capture the interactive nature of humor. | |Abstract=Humor is a potential communication strategy to accomplish various and potentially conflicting consultation goals. We investigated humor use and its reception in diabetes consultations by analyzing how and why humor emerges and its impact on the interaction. We did this by using an interactional sociolinguistics approach. We recorded 50 consultations in an Irish diabetes setting. Analysis of the humor events drew on framework analysis and on concepts from Conversation Analysis and pragmatics. The study also comprised interviews using tape-assisted recall. We identified 10 humor functions and two umbrella functions. A key finding is that most humor is relationship-protecting humor initiated by patients, that is, they voice serious messages and deal with emotional issues through humor. Our findings imply that patients’ and providers’ awareness of indirect communication strategies needs to be increased. We also recommend that researchers employ varied methods to adequately capture the interactive nature of humor. | ||
− | |||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 07:43, 7 August 2017
Schopf2016 | |
---|---|
BibType | ARTICLE |
Key | Schopf2016 |
Author(s) | Andrea C. Schöpf, Gillian S. Martin, Mary A. Keating |
Title | Humor as a Communication Strategy in Provider–Patient Communication in a Chronic Care Setting |
Editor(s) | |
Tag(s) | EMCA, Medical, Diabetes, Humour, Chronic illness, communication, conversation analysis, Europe / Europeans, humor, illness and disease, chronic, research, mixed methods, Qualitative methods |
Publisher | |
Year | 2016 |
Language | |
City | |
Month | |
Journal | Qualitative Health Research |
Volume | 27 |
Number | 3 |
Pages | 374-390 |
URL | Link |
DOI | Andrea C. Schöpf1⇑ Gillian S. Martin1 Mary A. Keating1 1Trinity College Dublin, the University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland Andrea C. Schöpf, Institute for Quality Management and Social Medicine, Medical Center- University of Freiburg, Engelbergerstrasse 21, 79106 Freiburg, Germany. Email: andrea.schoepf@uniklinik-freiburg.de Abstract Humor is a potential communication strategy to accomplish various and potentially conflicting consultation goals. We investigated humor use and its reception in diabetes consultations by analyzing how and why humor emerges and its impact on the interaction. We did this by using an interactional sociolinguistics approach. We recorded 50 consultations in an Irish diabetes setting. Analysis of the humor events drew on framework analysis and on concepts from Conversation Analysis and pragmatics. The study also comprised interviews using tape-assisted recall. We identified 10 humor functions and two umbrella functions. A key finding is that most humor is relationship-protecting humor initiated by patients, that is, they voice serious messages and deal with emotional issues through humor. Our findings imply that patients’ and providers’ awareness of indirect communication strategies needs to be increased. We also recommend that researchers employ varied methods to adequately capture the interactive nature of humor. communication, medical conversation analysis diabetes Europe / Europeans humor illness and disease, chronic research, mixed methods qualitative This Article Published online before print December 30, 2015, doi: 10.1177/1049732315620773 |
ISBN | |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | |
Howpublished | |
Book title | |
Chapter |
Abstract
Humor is a potential communication strategy to accomplish various and potentially conflicting consultation goals. We investigated humor use and its reception in diabetes consultations by analyzing how and why humor emerges and its impact on the interaction. We did this by using an interactional sociolinguistics approach. We recorded 50 consultations in an Irish diabetes setting. Analysis of the humor events drew on framework analysis and on concepts from Conversation Analysis and pragmatics. The study also comprised interviews using tape-assisted recall. We identified 10 humor functions and two umbrella functions. A key finding is that most humor is relationship-protecting humor initiated by patients, that is, they voice serious messages and deal with emotional issues through humor. Our findings imply that patients’ and providers’ awareness of indirect communication strategies needs to be increased. We also recommend that researchers employ varied methods to adequately capture the interactive nature of humor.
Notes