Difference between revisions of "Bovet2011"
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) m |
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Author(s)=Alain Bovet; Andrew P. Carlin; Philippe Sormani; | |Author(s)=Alain Bovet; Andrew P. Carlin; Philippe Sormani; | ||
|Title=Discovery starts here? The "Pulsar paper", thirty years on an ethno-bibliometric note | |Title=Discovery starts here? The "Pulsar paper", thirty years on an ethno-bibliometric note | ||
− | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Ethnomethodology; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Ethnomethodology; Discovery; Bibliometrics; |
|Key=Bovet2011 | |Key=Bovet2011 | ||
|Year=2011 | |Year=2011 | ||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|Pages=126–139 | |Pages=126–139 | ||
|URL=http://edoc.zhbluzern.ch/oaj/es/ethnographic_studies_12_08.pdf | |URL=http://edoc.zhbluzern.ch/oaj/es/ethnographic_studies_12_08.pdf | ||
+ | |Abstract=The “pulsar paper” was published 30 years ago. The anniversary of an important text | ||
+ | frequently provides an opportunity to assess or, at least, appreciate its academic influence. In the limited scope of this note, we cannot hope to offer a review article. Instead we would like to reflect upon what such a review or appraisal may mean and amount to, especially against the background of a parallel development in the period considered: the rise of evaluative bibliometrics via citation counts, rather than sustained reading, as a distinct set of procedures for assessing, by way of proxy, the academic influence of a text, thus identifiable as a “Citation Classic®” | ||
+ | |||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 09:42, 1 August 2017
Bovet2011 | |
---|---|
BibType | ARTICLE |
Key | Bovet2011 |
Author(s) | Alain Bovet, Andrew P. Carlin, Philippe Sormani |
Title | Discovery starts here? The "Pulsar paper", thirty years on an ethno-bibliometric note |
Editor(s) | |
Tag(s) | EMCA, Ethnomethodology, Discovery, Bibliometrics |
Publisher | |
Year | 2011 |
Language | |
City | |
Month | |
Journal | Ethnographic Studies |
Volume | 12 |
Number | |
Pages | 126–139 |
URL | Link |
DOI | |
ISBN | |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | |
Howpublished | |
Book title | |
Chapter |
Abstract
The “pulsar paper” was published 30 years ago. The anniversary of an important text frequently provides an opportunity to assess or, at least, appreciate its academic influence. In the limited scope of this note, we cannot hope to offer a review article. Instead we would like to reflect upon what such a review or appraisal may mean and amount to, especially against the background of a parallel development in the period considered: the rise of evaluative bibliometrics via citation counts, rather than sustained reading, as a distinct set of procedures for assessing, by way of proxy, the academic influence of a text, thus identifiable as a “Citation Classic®”
Notes