Difference between revisions of "Dupret2009"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) m |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Author(s)=Baudouin Dupret | |Author(s)=Baudouin Dupret | ||
|Title=The Judge, the Spirits and the Law: devil possession, personal agency and mind/body dichotomy in an Egyptian courtroom | |Title=The Judge, the Spirits and the Law: devil possession, personal agency and mind/body dichotomy in an Egyptian courtroom | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Law; Egypt; Agency; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Law; Egypt; Agency; |
|Key=Dupret2009 | |Key=Dupret2009 | ||
|Year=2009 | |Year=2009 | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|Pages=76-86 | |Pages=76-86 | ||
|URL=https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00829396/ | |URL=https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00829396/ | ||
| + | |Abstract=In this presentation, I am interested in the notion of the person and the way it is formulated in law on the books and practised in law in action. The notion of the legal person is closely associated with the concept of legal capacity and its opposite, incapacity. The presentation analyzes the legal and judicial uses of the category of the person as a normal and/or natural artifact. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 05:02, 1 August 2017
| Dupret2009 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Dupret2009 |
| Author(s) | Baudouin Dupret |
| Title | The Judge, the Spirits and the Law: devil possession, personal agency and mind/body dichotomy in an Egyptian courtroom |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Law, Egypt, Agency |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2009 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Ethnographic Studies |
| Volume | 11 |
| Number | |
| Pages | 76-86 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
In this presentation, I am interested in the notion of the person and the way it is formulated in law on the books and practised in law in action. The notion of the legal person is closely associated with the concept of legal capacity and its opposite, incapacity. The presentation analyzes the legal and judicial uses of the category of the person as a normal and/or natural artifact.
Notes
