Difference between revisions of "Pillet-Shore2012b"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m
 
Line 3: Line 3:
 
|Author(s)=Danielle Pillet-Shore;
 
|Author(s)=Danielle Pillet-Shore;
 
|Title=The problems with praise in parent-teacher interaction
 
|Title=The problems with praise in parent-teacher interaction
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Compliments; Education;
+
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Compliments; Education; delicates; laughter
 
|Key=Pillet-Shore2012b
 
|Key=Pillet-Shore2012b
 
|Year=2012
 
|Year=2012

Latest revision as of 12:32, 17 June 2017

Pillet-Shore2012b
BibType ARTICLE
Key Pillet-Shore2012b
Author(s) Danielle Pillet-Shore
Title The problems with praise in parent-teacher interaction
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Compliments, Education, delicates, laughter
Publisher
Year 2012
Language
City
Month
Journal Communication Monographs
Volume 79
Number 2
Pages 181–204
URL Link
DOI 10.1080/03637751.2012.672998
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

This research advances our understanding of what constitutes “a compliment” and “self-praise” in social interaction. Examining video-recorded naturally occurring parent–teacher conference interactions, this article demonstrates that participants treat utterances that praise nonpresent students as implicating praise of parents: parents respond to teachers’ student-praising utterances as compliments; teachers laugh after they explicitly credit student success to parents, displaying their orientation to these crediting utterances as delicate because they leak teachers’ evaluation of parents based upon students’ performance in school; and parents work to avoid articulating student-praising utterances, thereby avoiding implications of self-praise. This research thus reveals that, rather than affording a mutually enjoyable moment of celebration transparently supportive of social solidarity, the action of praising students occasions interactional problems for conference participants.

Notes