Difference between revisions of "Kerr2014"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=INCOLLECTION |Author(s)=Betsy Kerr |Title=Left dislocation in French: Information structure vs. (?) interactional linguistics |Editor(s)=S. Katz Bourns; L...") |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 06:23, 17 April 2017
Kerr2014 | |
---|---|
BibType | INCOLLECTION |
Key | Kerr2014 |
Author(s) | Betsy Kerr |
Title | Left dislocation in French: Information structure vs. (?) interactional linguistics |
Editor(s) | S. Katz Bourns, L.L. Myers |
Tag(s) | IL, French |
Publisher | |
Year | 2014 |
Language | |
City | |
Month | |
Journal | |
Volume | |
Number | |
Pages | 223-240 |
URL | Link |
DOI | 10.1075/pbns.244.11ker |
ISBN | |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | |
Howpublished | |
Book title | Perspectives on Linguistic Structure and Context: Studies in honor of Knud Lambrecht |
Chapter |
Abstract
A number of studies of Left Dislocation (LD) in spoken French within the Interactional Linguistics (IL) framework (de Fornel 1988; Pekarek Doehler 2001; Chevalier 2011b) have been critical of the information-structure analyses of this construction as set forth in Lambrecht (1981, 1994) and Barnes (1985). This discussion attempts to clarify the original information-structure analysis, arguing that the pragmatic definition of LD should be limited to the explicit marking of the sentence-topic and its associated comment. This topic-comment configuration is compatible with a large variety of particular functions with respect to the larger discourse and to speakers’ interactional purposes. Explanatorily useful IL analyses are those that make clear the connection between the topic-comment configuration and the proposed interactional function.
Notes