Difference between revisions of "Misgeld1980"
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) m |
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
|URL=http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF02331813 | |URL=http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF02331813 | ||
|DOI=10.1007/BF02331813 | |DOI=10.1007/BF02331813 | ||
| + | |Abstract=This essay examines the relation of reason and practical action by | ||
| + | reviewing Habermas' and Husserl's theories of the relation between discourse | ||
| + | and action (I), and then proposing Garfinkel's ethnomethodological studies | ||
| + | of practical action as an alternative to Husserl's and Habermas' | ||
| + | preoccupation with the primacy of theoretical discourse (II). In a final section | ||
| + | I shall interpret Garfinkel's studies, following his own suggestions as studies | ||
| + | in practical ethics, and make reference to similar themes in philosophical | ||
| + | ethics (Ill). | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 07:52, 28 March 2017
| Misgeld1980 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Misgeld1980 |
| Author(s) | Dieter Misgeld |
| Title | Ultimate self-responsibility, practical reasoning, and practical action: Habermas, Husserl, and ethnomethodology on discourse and action |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Ethnomethodology, Phenomenology, Habermas, Husserl |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 1980 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Human Studies |
| Volume | 3 |
| Number | 3 |
| Pages | 255–278 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1007/BF02331813 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This essay examines the relation of reason and practical action by reviewing Habermas' and Husserl's theories of the relation between discourse and action (I), and then proposing Garfinkel's ethnomethodological studies of practical action as an alternative to Husserl's and Habermas' preoccupation with the primacy of theoretical discourse (II). In a final section I shall interpret Garfinkel's studies, following his own suggestions as studies in practical ethics, and make reference to similar themes in philosophical ethics (Ill).
Notes
