Difference between revisions of "Kendrick2017"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Kobin H. Kendrick; |Title=Using Conversation Analysis in the Lab |Tag(s)=EMCA; Laboratories; Conversation Analysis; Experimental Method...") |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 08:50, 25 February 2017
| Kendrick2017 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Kendrick2017 |
| Author(s) | Kobin H. Kendrick |
| Title | Using Conversation Analysis in the Lab |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Laboratories, Conversation Analysis, Experimental Methods, Methodology |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2017 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Research on Language and Social Interaction |
| Volume | 50 |
| Number | 1 |
| Pages | 1-11 |
| URL | |
| DOI | 10.1080/08351813.2017.1267911 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
In this introduction to the special issue of Research on Language and Social Interaction on “Experimental and Laboratory Approaches to Conversation Analysis,” I make the case that while naturalistic observation should take precedence over other methods, Conversation Analysis as a field should embrace a methodological pluralism that includes not only quantification but also experimentation and laboratory observation. Before I introduce the contributions to the special issue, I discuss the prohibition against such meth- ods in the field, situate naturalistic and laboratory research on a methodologi- cal continuum, and develop a series of arguments in favor of experimental and laboratory studies of interaction.
Notes
