Difference between revisions of "Clift2010"
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Rebecca Clift; Fadi Helani |Title=Inshallah: Religious invocations in Arabic topic transition |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; Arabi...") |
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Author(s)=Rebecca Clift; Fadi Helani | |Author(s)=Rebecca Clift; Fadi Helani | ||
|Title=Inshallah: Religious invocations in Arabic topic transition | |Title=Inshallah: Religious invocations in Arabic topic transition | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; Arabic; Religion; Religious Expressions; Topic; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; Arabic; Religion; Religious Expressions; Topic; |
|Key=Clift2010 | |Key=Clift2010 | ||
|Year=2010 | |Year=2010 | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
|Pages=357-382 | |Pages=357-382 | ||
|URL=http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=7732876&fileId=S0047404510000199 | |URL=http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=7732876&fileId=S0047404510000199 | ||
| − | |DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0047404510000199 | + | |DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0047404510000199 |
| − | |Abstract= | + | |Abstract=The phrase inshallah 'God willing' is well known even to non Arabic speakers, as a mitigator of any statement regarding the future or hopes for the future. Here we use the methods of conversation analysis (CA) to examine a less salient but nonetheless pervasive and compelling interactional usage: in topic-transition sequences. We use a corpus of Levantine (predominantly Syrian) Arabic talk-in-interaction to pay detailed attention to the sequential contexts of inshallah and its cognates across a number of exemplars. It emerges that these invocations are used to secure possible sequence and topic closure, and that they may engender reciprocal invocations. Topical talk following invocations or their responses is subsequently shown to be suspended by both parties; this provides for a move to a new topic by either party. |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | The phrase inshallah | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 10:18, 24 January 2017
| Clift2010 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Clift2010 |
| Author(s) | Rebecca Clift, Fadi Helani |
| Title | Inshallah: Religious invocations in Arabic topic transition |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Conversation Analysis, Arabic, Religion, Religious Expressions, Topic |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2010 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Language in Society |
| Volume | 39 |
| Number | 3 |
| Pages | 357-382 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0047404510000199 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
The phrase inshallah 'God willing' is well known even to non Arabic speakers, as a mitigator of any statement regarding the future or hopes for the future. Here we use the methods of conversation analysis (CA) to examine a less salient but nonetheless pervasive and compelling interactional usage: in topic-transition sequences. We use a corpus of Levantine (predominantly Syrian) Arabic talk-in-interaction to pay detailed attention to the sequential contexts of inshallah and its cognates across a number of exemplars. It emerges that these invocations are used to secure possible sequence and topic closure, and that they may engender reciprocal invocations. Topical talk following invocations or their responses is subsequently shown to be suspended by both parties; this provides for a move to a new topic by either party.
Notes
