Difference between revisions of "Hudak2010"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Pamela L. Hudak; Virginia Teas Gill; Jeffrey P. Aguinaldo; Shannon Clark; Richard Frankel; |Title="I've heard wonderful things about yo...")
(No difference)

Revision as of 14:04, 29 November 2016

Hudak2010
BibType ARTICLE
Key Hudak2010
Author(s) Pamela L. Hudak, Virginia Teas Gill, Jeffrey P. Aguinaldo, Shannon Clark, Richard Frankel
Title "I've heard wonderful things about you": How patients complement surgeons
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Medical EMCA, Conversation Analysis, Compliments, Doctor-patient interaction
Publisher
Year 2010
Language
City
Month
Journal Sociology of Health & Illness
Volume 32
Number 5
Pages 777-797
URL Link
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2010.01248.x
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

This investigation was motivated by physician reports that patient compliments often raise ‘red flags’ for them, raising questions about whether compliments are being used in the service of achieving some kind of advantage. Our goal was to understand physician discomfort with patient compliments through analyses of audiotaped surgeon-patient encounters. Using conversation analysis, we demonstrate that both the placement and design of compliments are consequential for how surgeons hear and respond to them. The compliments offered after treatment recommendations are neither designed nor positioned to pursue institutional agendas and are responded to in ways that are largely consistent with compliment responses in everyday interaction, but include modifications that preserve surgeons’ expertise. In contrast, some compliments offered before treatment recommendations pursue specific treatments and engender surgeons’ resistance. Other compliments offered before treatment recommendations do not overtly pursue institutionally-relevant agendas—for example, compliments offered in the opening phase of the visit. We show how these compliments may but need not foreshadow a patient’s upcoming agenda. This work extends our understanding of the interactional functions of compliments, and of the resources patients use to pursue desired outcomes in encounters with healthcare professionals.

Notes