Difference between revisions of "Housley2003"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=William Housley; Richard Fitzgerald; |Title=Moral discrepancy and political discourse: Accountability and the allocation of blame in a...")
 
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 13:51, 29 November 2016

Housley2003
BibType ARTICLE
Key Housley2003
Author(s) William Housley, Richard Fitzgerald
Title Moral discrepancy and political discourse: Accountability and the allocation of blame in a political news interview
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Membership Categorization Analysis, Interviews, Morality, Political communication, Blame, Accountability, News interviews
Publisher
Year 2003
Language
City
Month
Journal Sociological Research Online
Volume 8
Number 2
Pages
URL Link
DOI
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

During the course of this article we intend to explore some issues surrounding government policy and actions and the moral organisation of political discourse surrounding the recent enquiry into the BSE crisis and the publication of the Phillips Report in the UK. More specifically, we wish to develop the concept of moral discrepancy and it's use in politically accountable settings, in this case the political interview. The paper, through the use of membership categorisation analysis, explores issues surrounding the social organisation of interview settings, the discursive management of policy decisions and 'bureaucratic mistakes' and the allocation of blame in situated media/political formats. The paper then relates these issues to notions of democracy-in-action, public ethics and the respecification of structure and agency as a members phenomenon.

Notes