Difference between revisions of "Busch-Danby2016"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Gillian Busch; Susan Danby |Title=From Fledgling Manoeuvres to Methodological Confidence: Conversations Between a Doctoral Student and S...")
 
m
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{BibEntry
 
{{BibEntry
|BibType=ARTICLE
+
|BibType=INCOLLECTION
 
|Author(s)=Gillian Busch; Susan Danby
 
|Author(s)=Gillian Busch; Susan Danby
 
|Title=From Fledgling Manoeuvres to Methodological Confidence: Conversations Between a Doctoral Student and Supervisor on Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis to Explore the Everyday Worlds of Children and Families
 
|Title=From Fledgling Manoeuvres to Methodological Confidence: Conversations Between a Doctoral Student and Supervisor on Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis to Explore the Everyday Worlds of Children and Families
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Professional competence; Training;  
+
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Professional competence; Training;
 
|Key=Busch-Danby2016
 
|Key=Busch-Danby2016
 
|Year=2016
 
|Year=2016
 +
|Language=English
 
|Booktitle=Constructing Methodology for Qualitative Research
 
|Booktitle=Constructing Methodology for Qualitative Research
 
|Pages=237-252
 
|Pages=237-252
Line 11: Line 12:
 
|DOI=10.1057/978-1-137-59943-8_16
 
|DOI=10.1057/978-1-137-59943-8_16
 
|Abstract=Busch and Danby engage in a rich and honest dialogue to capture the methodological challenges encountered by a PhD candidate while learning a new methodology. In using storytelling as a device to examine methodological challenges, the perspectives of both the student and the supervisor are communicated. Beginning with an overview of ethnomethodology and conversation analysis, the authors pay attention to challenges connected to data collection when using video recording to capture family in situ practices, transcription of data that captures the fine detail of the interaction, and data analysis. While challenges are examined, the authors also provide a number of strategies that support the methodological maneuvering. These include engaging in data sessions with supervisors and with other conversation analysts committing to join the ethnomethodology research community.
 
|Abstract=Busch and Danby engage in a rich and honest dialogue to capture the methodological challenges encountered by a PhD candidate while learning a new methodology. In using storytelling as a device to examine methodological challenges, the perspectives of both the student and the supervisor are communicated. Beginning with an overview of ethnomethodology and conversation analysis, the authors pay attention to challenges connected to data collection when using video recording to capture family in situ practices, transcription of data that captures the fine detail of the interaction, and data analysis. While challenges are examined, the authors also provide a number of strategies that support the methodological maneuvering. These include engaging in data sessions with supervisors and with other conversation analysts committing to join the ethnomethodology research community.
 
 
}}
 
}}

Revision as of 03:33, 6 December 2017

Busch-Danby2016
BibType INCOLLECTION
Key Busch-Danby2016
Author(s) Gillian Busch, Susan Danby
Title From Fledgling Manoeuvres to Methodological Confidence: Conversations Between a Doctoral Student and Supervisor on Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis to Explore the Everyday Worlds of Children and Families
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Professional competence, Training
Publisher
Year 2016
Language English
City
Month
Journal
Volume
Number
Pages 237-252
URL Link
DOI 10.1057/978-1-137-59943-8_16
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title Constructing Methodology for Qualitative Research
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

Busch and Danby engage in a rich and honest dialogue to capture the methodological challenges encountered by a PhD candidate while learning a new methodology. In using storytelling as a device to examine methodological challenges, the perspectives of both the student and the supervisor are communicated. Beginning with an overview of ethnomethodology and conversation analysis, the authors pay attention to challenges connected to data collection when using video recording to capture family in situ practices, transcription of data that captures the fine detail of the interaction, and data analysis. While challenges are examined, the authors also provide a number of strategies that support the methodological maneuvering. These include engaging in data sessions with supervisors and with other conversation analysts committing to join the ethnomethodology research community.

Notes