Difference between revisions of "Maynard2017a"
ElliottHoey (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Douglas W. Maynard; |Title=Delivering bad news in emergency care medicine |Tag(s)=EMCA; News; Emergency Calls; In Press; |Key=Maynard2...") |
m (published) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| − | |Author(s)=Douglas W. Maynard; | + | |Author(s)=Douglas W. Maynard; |
|Title=Delivering bad news in emergency care medicine | |Title=Delivering bad news in emergency care medicine | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; News; Emergency Calls | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; News; Emergency Calls |
| − | |Key= | + | |Key=Maynard2017a |
| − | |Year= | + | |Year=2017 |
|Journal=Acute Medicine & Surgery | |Journal=Acute Medicine & Surgery | ||
| + | |Volume=4 | ||
| + | |Number=1 | ||
| + | |Pages=3-11 | ||
|URL=http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ams2.210/full | |URL=http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ams2.210/full | ||
| − | |DOI= | + | |DOI=10.1002/ams2.210 |
|Abstract=Forecasting is a strategy for delivering bad news and is compared to two other strategies, stalling and being blunt. Forecasting provides some warning that bad news is forthcoming without keeping the recipient in a state of indefinite suspense (stalling) or conveying the news abruptly (being blunt). Forecasting appears to be more effective than stalling or being blunt in helping a recipient to “realize” the bad news because it involves the deliverer and recipient in a particular social relation. The deliverer of bad news initiates the telling by giving an advance indication of the bad news to come; this allows the recipient to calculate the news in advance of its final presentation, when the deliverer confirms what the recipient has been led to anticipate. Thus, realization of bad news emerges from intimate collaboration, whereas stalling and being blunt require recipients to apprehend the news in a social vacuum. Exacerbating disruption to recipients' everyday world, stalling and being blunt increase the probability of misapprehension (denying, blaming, taking the situation as a joke, etc.) and thereby inhibit rather than facilitate realization. Particular attention is paid to the “perspective display sequence”, a particular forecasting strategy that enables both confirming the recipient's perspective and using that perspective to affirm the clinical news. An example from acute or emergency medicine is examined at the close of the paper. | |Abstract=Forecasting is a strategy for delivering bad news and is compared to two other strategies, stalling and being blunt. Forecasting provides some warning that bad news is forthcoming without keeping the recipient in a state of indefinite suspense (stalling) or conveying the news abruptly (being blunt). Forecasting appears to be more effective than stalling or being blunt in helping a recipient to “realize” the bad news because it involves the deliverer and recipient in a particular social relation. The deliverer of bad news initiates the telling by giving an advance indication of the bad news to come; this allows the recipient to calculate the news in advance of its final presentation, when the deliverer confirms what the recipient has been led to anticipate. Thus, realization of bad news emerges from intimate collaboration, whereas stalling and being blunt require recipients to apprehend the news in a social vacuum. Exacerbating disruption to recipients' everyday world, stalling and being blunt increase the probability of misapprehension (denying, blaming, taking the situation as a joke, etc.) and thereby inhibit rather than facilitate realization. Particular attention is paid to the “perspective display sequence”, a particular forecasting strategy that enables both confirming the recipient's perspective and using that perspective to affirm the clinical news. An example from acute or emergency medicine is examined at the close of the paper. | ||
| − | |||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 09:15, 6 August 2017
| Maynard2017a | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Maynard2017a |
| Author(s) | Douglas W. Maynard |
| Title | Delivering bad news in emergency care medicine |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, News, Emergency Calls |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2017 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Acute Medicine & Surgery |
| Volume | 4 |
| Number | 1 |
| Pages | 3-11 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1002/ams2.210 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Forecasting is a strategy for delivering bad news and is compared to two other strategies, stalling and being blunt. Forecasting provides some warning that bad news is forthcoming without keeping the recipient in a state of indefinite suspense (stalling) or conveying the news abruptly (being blunt). Forecasting appears to be more effective than stalling or being blunt in helping a recipient to “realize” the bad news because it involves the deliverer and recipient in a particular social relation. The deliverer of bad news initiates the telling by giving an advance indication of the bad news to come; this allows the recipient to calculate the news in advance of its final presentation, when the deliverer confirms what the recipient has been led to anticipate. Thus, realization of bad news emerges from intimate collaboration, whereas stalling and being blunt require recipients to apprehend the news in a social vacuum. Exacerbating disruption to recipients' everyday world, stalling and being blunt increase the probability of misapprehension (denying, blaming, taking the situation as a joke, etc.) and thereby inhibit rather than facilitate realization. Particular attention is paid to the “perspective display sequence”, a particular forecasting strategy that enables both confirming the recipient's perspective and using that perspective to affirm the clinical news. An example from acute or emergency medicine is examined at the close of the paper.
Notes
