|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | * Antaki, Charles, Sue Widdicombe, ed. (1998) Identities in Talk. London: Sage
| + | Check http://www.paultenhave.nl/MCA-bib.pdf for the last update (last planned update to Paul's website was the 1st October 2014). |
| − | * Austin, Helena, Richard Fitzgerald (2007) ‘Resisting categorisation: An ordinary mother’. In Johanna Rendle-Short & Maurice Nevile, eds. Language as action: Australian studies in conversation analysis. Special thematic issue, Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 30(3): Available via http://publications.epress.monash.edu/loi/aral
| |
| − | * Baker, Carolyn (1984) ’The search for adultness: membership work in adolescent-adult talk’,Human Studies 7: 301-23
| |
| − | * Baker, Carolyn (1997) ‘Membership categorization and interview accounts’. In: D. Silverman, ed.
| |
| − | * Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice.London: Sage: 130-43
| |
| − | * Baker, Carolyn D. (1997) ‘Ticketing rules: categorization and moral ordening in a school staff meeting’. In: Hester, S., P. Eglin, eds., Culture in action: studies in membership categorization analysis. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America: 77-98
| |
| − | * Baker, Carolyn D. (2000) ‘Locating culture in action: membership categorisation in texts and talk’. In: A. Lee, C. Poynton, eds. Culture and text: discourse and methodology in social research and cultural studies. St. Leonards, NSW: Allen & Unwin: 99-113
| |
| − | * Baker, Carolyn D (2004) Membership categorization and interview accounts. In: David Silverman, ed. Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice, 2nd edn. London: Sage:162–176
| |
| − | * Bartesaghi, Mariaelena, Sheryl Perlmutter Bowen (2009) ’The acquisition of memory by interview questioning: Holocaust re-membering as category-bound activity’ Discourse Studies 11: 223-243.
| |
| − | * Barthélémy, M. (1999) ’La lecture-en-action: entre la présupposé d’un monde objectif et son accomplissement situé’ [Reading-in-action: between the presupposition of an objective world and its situated accomplishment], langage & sociétén° 89: 95-121
| |
| − | * Bateman, Amanda (2012) ‘Forging friendships: The use of collective pro-terms by pre-school children´, Discourse Studies 14: 165-180
| |
| − | * Berard..Tim J. (2002) ‘“Japanese American” Identity and the Problem of Multiple Description: Disjunctive Versions of the Japanese Exclusion Order’, In Stephen Hester and William Housley, ed., Language, Interaction and National Identity: Studies in the social organisation of national identity and talk-in-interaction. Aldershot: Ashgate:144-168
| |
| − | * Berard, Tim J. (2005) ‘Evaluative categories of action and identity in non evaluative human studies research: examples from ethnomethodology’,Qualitative Sociology Review 1 [ http://www.qualitativesociologyreview.org /ENG/archive_eng.php]
| |
| − | * Berard, Tim J. (2005) ‘Extending Hate Crime Legislation to Include Gender: Explicating an Analogical Method of Advocacy’, Qualitative Sociology Review ½ [ http://www.qualitativesociologyreview.org/ENG/archive_eng.php ]
| |
| − | * Berard, Tim J. (2005) ‘Rethinking practices and structures’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences 35: 196-230.
| |
| − | * Berard, Tim J. (2006) ‘From concepts to methods: On the observability of inequality.’ Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 35(3): 236-256.
| |
| − | * Berard, Tim J. (2010) ‘Unpacking “Institutional Racism”: Insights from Wittgenstein, Garfinkel, Schutz, Goffman, and Sacks,’ Schutzian Research2: 109-133
| |
| − | * Bergmann, Jörg (2010) ‘Die kategoriale Herstellung von Ethnizität - Ethnomethodologische Überlegungen zur Ethnizitätsforschung’. in: Marion Müller/Darius Zifonun, Hrsg., Ethnowissen: Soziologische Beiträge zu ethnischer Differenzierung und Migration. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften: 155-169
| |
| − | * Bilmes, Jack (2008) ‘Generally speaking: Formulating an argument in the US Federal Trade Commission’, Text & Talk 28 | 2: 193-217
| |
| − | * Bilmes, Jack (2009) ‘Taxonomies are for talking: Reanalyzing a Sacks classic’, Journal of Pragmatics 41(8): 1600-1610
| |
| − | * Bilmes, Jack (2009) ‘Kinship categories in a Northern Thai narrative’. In: H. Nguyen and G. Kasper (eds.), Talk-in-Interaction: Multilingual Perspectives.’ Honolulu, Hawaii: National Foreign Language Resource Center: 29-56
| |
| − | * Bilmes, Jack (2011) ‘Occasioned semantics: a systematic approach to meaning in talk’, Human Studies, 34/2: 155-181
| |
| − | * Bonu, Bruno (2014) ‘L’interaction de part et d’autre des barreaux :catégorisations dans la vidéocommunication’. In: Luca Greco, Lorenza Mondada, Patrick Renaud, eds., Identités en interaction, Limoges: Lambert Lucas: 115-136
| |
| − | * Bonu, Bruno, Lorenza Mondada, Marc Relieu (1994) ‘Catégorisation: l’approche de Sacks’. In: B. Fradin, L. Quéré, J. Widmer, eds. L’enquête sur les catégories. Paris: École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales [Raisons pratiques: Épistémologie, sociologie, théorie sociale/5]: 129-48
| |
| − | * Bovet, Alain (2009) ‘Configuring a television debate: categorisation, questions and answers’. In. Richard Fitzgerald,William Housley, eds. Media, Policy and Interaction. Farnham, Surey, U.K.: Ashgate: 27-48
| |
| − | * Bridges, Susan, Brendan Bartlett (2009) ‘Moving teachers: public texts and institutional power’. In. Richard Fitzgerald,William Housley, eds.Media, Policy and Interaction. Farnham, Surey, U.K.: Ashgate: 185-204
| |
| − | * Broadhurst, Karen (2007) ’Parental help-seeking and the moral order. Notes for policy makers and parenting practitioners on “the first port of call” and “no one to turn to”’ Sociological Research Online, 12(6) http://www.socresonline.org.uk/12/6/4.html
| |
| − | * Butler, Carly W. (2008) Talk and Social Interaction in the Playground. Aldershot: Ashgate [Series : Directions in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis]
| |
| − | * Butler, Carly, Ann Weatherall (2006) ‘“No, we’re not playing families”: Membership categorization in children’s play’, Research on Language and Social Interaction 39: 441-70
| |
| − | * Carlin, Andrew (2003) ‘Observation and membership categorization: Recognizing “normal appearances” in public space’, Journal of Mundane Behavior4/1: http://mundanebehavior.org/
| |
| − | * Clifton, Jonathan (2009) ‘A membership categorization analysis of the Waco siege: Perpetrator-victim identity as a moral discrepancy device for ‘doing’ subversion’, Sociological Research Online, 14/5 [http://www.socresonline.org.uk/14/5/8.html]
| |
| − | * Collet, Tanja (2009) ’Civilization and civilized in post-9/11 US presidential speeches’, Discourse & Society 20: 455-475
| |
| − | * Conein, Bernard (2001) ‘Classification sociale et catégorisation’. In: Fornel, Michel de, Albert Ogien, Louis Quéré (dir.) L’ethnométhodologie: une sociologie radicale [Colloque de Cerisy]. Paris: Editions La Découverte [Collection “Recherches”]: 239-58
| |
| − | * Coulter, Jeff (1991) ‘Logic: ethnomethodology and the logic of language’. In: G. Button, ed.Ethnomethodology and the human sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 20-50
| |
| − | * Cruz, Fernanda Miranda Da (2014) ‘Categorizations of patients diagnosed with Alzheimer’s: alternative membership categorization devices displayed by participants in talk-in-interaction’. In: Luca Greco, Lorenza Mondada, Patrick Renaud, eds., Identités en interaction, Limoges: Lambert Lucas: 193-214
| |
| − | * Cuff, E.C. (1993) Problems of Versions in Everyday Situations. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America
| |
| − | * Day, Dennis (1994). ‘Tang’s dilemma and other problems: Ethnification processes at some multicultural workplaces’. Pragmatics, 4, 315-336.
| |
| − | * Day, Dennis (1998) ‘Being ascribed and resisting membership in an ethnic group’. In: Charles Antaki & Sue Widdicombe, eds. Identities in Talk. London, Sage: 151-70
| |
| − | * Day, Dennis (2006) ‘Ethnic and social groups and their linguistic categorization’. In Kristin Bührig, Jan D. ten Thije, eds. Beyond misunderstanding: Linguistic analyses of intercultural communication. Amsterdam: Benjamins: 217 – 244
| |
| − | * Day, Dennis (2012) ‘Conversation analysis and membership categories’. In Carol A. Chapelle, ed. The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell
| |
| − | * Demosthenous, Catherine .M. (2010). Social Inclusion and Exclusion in Universities: Linguistics, Categories and Conversational Resources. Saarbrücken: VDM Verlag,.
| |
| − | * Demosthenous Catherine M.(2012) ‘Inclusion/exclusion for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Students: Understanding how ‘We’ matters’, Journal of Social Inclusion 3/1: 71-85
| |
| − | * Deppermann, Arnulf (2005). ‘Conversational interpretation of lexical items and conversational contrasting’. In: A. Hakulinen & M. Selting, eds., Syntax and lexis in conversation: Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 289–306
| |
| − | * Deppermann, Arnulf (2011) ‘The study of formulations as a key to an interactional semantics’, Human Studies, 34/2: 115–128
| |
| − | * Deppermann, Arnulf (2011) ‘Notionalization: The transformation of descriptions into categorizations’, Human Studies, 34/2: 155–181
| |
| − | * Deppermann, Arnulf. (2013) ‘(What) does “Positioning” offer more than “Membership Categorization”? Evidence from a mock story’, Narrative Inquiry, 23/1: 62-88
| |
| − | * De Stefani, Elwys, Anne-Sylvie Horlacher (2008) ‘Topical and sequential backlinking in a french radio phone-in program: Turn shapes and sequential placements’, Pragmatics 18:3.381-406
| |
| − | * Dillon, Patrick J.(2011) ‘Moral accounts and membership categorization in primary care medical interviews’, Communication & Medicine, 8/3: 211-22
| |
| − | * Edwards, Derek (1991) ‘Categories are for Talking: On the Cognitive and Discursive Bases of Categorization’, Theory and Psychology1(4): 515–42.
| |
| − | * Edwards, Derek (1998) ‘The relevant thing about her: social identity categories in use’ In: Charles Antaki, Sue Widdicombe, eds. Identities in talk. London: Sage: 15-33
| |
| − | * Egbert, Maria (2004) ’Other-initiated Repair and Membership Categorization: Some conversational events that trigger linguistic and regional membership categorization’, Journal of Pragmatics 36: 1467-98.
| |
| − | * Eglin, Peter (2002) ‘Members’ gendering work: ‘women’, ‘feminists’ and membership categorization analysis’, Discourse & Society 13: 819-25
| |
| − | * Eglin, Peter, Stephen Hester (1992) ‘Category, Predicate and Task: The Pragmatics of Practical Action’, Semiotica 88: 243–68
| |
| − | * Eglin, Peter, Stephen Hester (1999) Moral order and the Montreal massacre: a story of membership categorization analysis.’ In: P.L. Jalbert, (Ed.)Media Studies: Ethnomethodological Approaches. Lanham, New York, Oxford: University Press of America: 195-230
| |
| − | * Eglin, Peter, Stephen Hester (1999) “You’re all a bunch of feminists:” Categorization and the politics of terror in the Montreal Massacre’, Human Studies 22: 253-72
| |
| − | * Eglin, Peter, Stephen Hester (2003) The Montreal Massacre A Story of Membership Categorization Analysis. Waterloo, ONT, Ca: Wilfrid Laurier University Press
| |
| − | * Evaldsson, Ann-Carita (2007) ‘Accounting for friendship: moral ordering and category membership in preadolescent girls’ relational talk’ Research on Language & Social Interaction 40/ 4: 377-404
| |
| − | * Fitzgerald Richard (2012) ‘Membership categorization analysis: Wild and promiscuous or simply the joy of Sacks?’, Discourse Studies14: 305-311
| |
| − | * Fitzgerald, Richard, William Housley (2002) ‘Identity, categorisation and sequential organisation: the sequential and categorial flow of identity in a radio phone-in’, Discourse and Society 13: 579-602.
| |
| − | * Fitzgerald, Richard, William Housley (2006) ’Categorisation, accounts and motives: “Letters-to-the-editor” and devolution in Wales’. In John Wilson & Karyn Stapleton, eds. Devolution and Identity. Aldershot Ashgate: 111-26
| |
| − | * Fitzgerald, Richard, William Housley (2007) ‘Talkback, Community and the Public Sphere’, Media International Australia. No 122: 150-63
| |
| − | * Fitzgerald, Richard ,William Housley, eds. (2009) Media, Policy and Interaction. Farnham, Surey, U.K.: Ashgate:
| |
| − | * Fitzgerald, Richard , William Housley (2009) ‘Media, Policy and Interaction: introduction’. In. Richard Fitzgerald,William Housley, eds. Media, Policy and Interaction. Farnham, Surey, U.K.: Ashgate: 1-12
| |
| − | * Forrester, Michael A.; David Reason (2006) ‘Competency and participation in acquiring a mastery of language: a reconsideration of the idea of membership’,The Sociological Review 54/3: 446-66
| |
| − | * Fradin, Bernard, Louis Quéré, Jean Widmer, eds. (1994)L’enquête sur les categories. Paris: École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales [Raisons pratiques: Épistémologie, sociologie, théorie sociale/5]
| |
| − | * Francis, David, Christopher Hart (1997) ‘Narrative intelligibility and membership categorization in a television commercial’. In: Hester, S., P. Eglin, eds.,Culture in action: studies in membership categorization analysis. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America: 123-52
| |
| − | * Freebody, Peter, Carolyn D. Baker (1996) ’Categories and sense-making in the talk and texts of schooling’. In: G. Bull & M. Anstey (eds.)Lexicons of Literacy. Sydney: Prentice Hall: 145-59
| |
| − | * Fukuda, Chie (2014) ‘Identities and linguistic varieties in Japanese: An analysis of language ideologies as participants’ accomplishments’, Pragmatics 24:1. 35-62
| |
| − | * Gafaranga, Joseph; Nicky Britten (2004) ‘Formulation in general practice consultations’, Text, 24/2: 147–170
| |
| − | * Gardner Rod (2012) ‘Enriching CA through MCA? Stokoe’s MCA keys’,Discourse Studies 14: 313-319
| |
| − | * Garot, Bob; Tim J. Berard (2010) ‘Ethnomethodology and Membership Categorization Analysis’. in:Ruth Wodak, Barbara Johnstone, Paul Kerswill, eds. Sage Handbook of Sociolinguistics, Los Angeles: Sage: 125-138
| |
| − | * Graumans, Ineke; Harry van den Berg (2008) ‘Memberschip Categorization Analysis: Een frame-analyse van open interviews met jonge kinderen op een etnisch gemengde school’, KWALON 13/3
| |
| − | * Grancea, Liana (2010) ‘Ethnic solidarity as interactional accomplishment: An analysis of interethnic complaints in Romanianand Hungarian focus groups’, Discourse & Society, 21/2: 161-188
| |
| − | * Goodman S, Speer, Susan A.,(2007). ‘Category Use in the Construction of Asylum Seekers’, Critical Discourse Studies, 4/2: 165-185.
| |
| − | * Gotsbachner, Emo (2009) ‘Asserting interpretive frames of political events: panel discussions on television news’. In. Richard Fitzgerald,William Housley, eds. Media, Policy and Interaction. Farnham, Surey, U.K.: Ashgate: 49-72
| |
| − | * Greco, Luca; Lorenza Mondada (2014) ‘Les identités-en-interaction : vers une approche multidimensionnelle’. In: Luca Greco, Lorenza Mondada, Patrick Renaud, eds., Identités en interaction, Limoges: Lambert Lucas: 7-28
| |
| − | * Greco, Luca; Lorenza Mondada, Patrick Renaud, eds., (2014) Identités en interaction, Limoges: Lambert Lucas
| |
| − | * Hansen, Alan D. (2005) ‘A practical task: ethnicity as a resource in social interaction’,Research on Language and Social Interaction,38(1), 63-104
| |
| − | * Hauser, Eric (2011) ‘Generalization: A practice of situated categorization in talk’, Human Studies, 34/2:183–198
| |
| − | * Hester, Sally; Stephen Hester (2012) ‘Categorial occasionality and transformation: analyzing culture in action’, Human Studies 35/4: 563-581
| |
| − | * Hester, Stephen (1992) ‘Recognizing references to deviance in referral talk’. In: G. Watson, R.M. Seiler, eds. Text in Context: Contributions to ethnomethodology. London: Sage: 156-74
| |
| − | * Hester, Stephen (1994) ‘Les catégories en contexte’. In: B. Fradin, L. Quéré, J. Widmer, eds. (1994)L’enquête sur les catégories. Paris: École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales [Raisons pratiques: Épistémologie, sociologie, théorie sociale/5]: 219-42
| |
| − | * Hester, Stephen, Peter Eglin, eds. (1997) Culture in action: studies in membership categorization analysis. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America
| |
| − | * Hester, Stephen, Peter Eglin (1997) ’Membership categorization analysis: an introduction. In: Hester, S., P. Eglin, eds., Culture in action: studies in membership categorization analysis. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America: 1-24
| |
| − | * Hester, Stephen, Peter Eglin (1997) ‘The reflexive constitution of category, predicate and context in two settings’. In: Hester, S., P. Eglin, eds.,Culture in action: studies in membership categorization analysis. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America: 25-48
| |
| − | * Hester, Stephen, Richard Fitzgerald (1999) ‘Category, predicate and contrast: some organizational features in a radio talk show’. In: P.L. Jalbert, (Ed.) Media Studies:
| |
| − | * Ethnomethodological Approaches. Lanham, New York, Oxford: University Press of America: 171-94
| |
| − | * Hester, Stephen, David Francis (2000) ’Category play in a school staff-room’,Ethnographic Studies 5: 42-55
| |
| − | * Hester, Stephen, William Housley, eds. (2002) Language, Interaction and National Identity: Studies in the social organisation of national identity in talk-in-interaction. Aldershot: Ashgate
| |
| − | * Higgins, Christina (2007) ‘Constructing membership in the in-group: Affiliation and resistance among urban Tanzanians’, Pragmatics 17:1.49-70
| |
| − | * Housley, William (1999) ‘Role as an Interactional Device and Resource in Multidisciplinary Team Meetings’, Sociological Research Online, vol. 4, no. 3, < http://www.socresonline.org.uk/socresonline/4/3/housley.html >
| |
| − | * Housley, William (2000) ‘Category Work and Knowledgeability within Multidisciplinary Team Meetings’, TEXT, 20: 83-107
| |
| − | * Housley, William (2002) ‘The Moral Discrepancy Device and Fudging the Issue in a Political Radio News Interview’, Sociology 34/3: 5-21
| |
| − | * Housley, William (2003) Interaction in Multidisciplinary Teams. Aldershot, Ashgate
| |
| − | * Housley, William, Richard Fitzgerald (2001) ‘Categorisation, Narrative and Devolution in Wales’
| |
| − | * Sociological Research Online, vol. 6, no. 2 < http://www.socresonline.org.uk/6/2/housley.html >
| |
| − | * Housley, William, Richard Fitzgerald (2002) ‘The reconsidered model of membership categorization analysis’, Qualitative Research. 2: 59-83
| |
| − | * Housley, William, Richard Fitzgerald (2002) ‘Categorization, National Ideneity, Categorization and Debate’. In: Stephen Hester and William Housley, eds. Language, Interaction and National Identity. Aldershot: Ashgate: 38 - 59
| |
| − | * Housley, William, Richard Fitzgerald (2003) ‘Moral Discrepancy and Political Discourse: Accountability and the Allocation of Blame in a Political News Interview’, Sociological Research Online, vol. 8, no. 2, < http://www.socresonline.org.uk/8/2/housley.html >
| |
| − | * Housley, William, Richard Fitzgerald (2006) ’Categorisation, Accounts and Motives: ‘Letters-to-the-editor’ and Devolution in Wales’. In Karyn Stapleton, John Wilson, eds.Devolution and Identity,, Aldershot: Ashgate: 111-126
| |
| − | * Housley, William, Richard Fitzgerald (2007) ‘Categorisation, Interaction, Policy and Debate’.
| |
| − | * Critical Discourse Studies, Vol. 2/1: 187-206
| |
| − | * Housley, William, Richard Fitzgerald (2009) ‘Membership categorization, culture and norms in action’, Discourse & Society 20: 345-362.
| |
| − | * Housley, William, Stephen Hester (2002) ‘Ethnomethodology and National Identity’. In: Stephen Hester, William Housley, eds. Language, Interaction and National Identity. Aldershot: Ashgate: 1-15
| |
| − | * Housley, William; Robin James Smith (2011) ‘Telling the CAQDAS code: Membership categorization and the accomplishment of ‘coding rules’ in research team talk’, Discourse Studies 13: 417-434
| |
| − | * Jalbert, Paul L. (1989) ‘Categorization and beliefs: news accounts of Haitian and Cuban Refugees’. In: Helm, D.T., W.T. Anderson, A.J. Meehan, A.W. Rawls, eds. The interactional order: New directions in the study of social order. New York: Irvington: 23148
| |
| − | * Jayyusi, Lena (1984) Categorization and the moral order. Boston, etc. Routledge & Kegan Paul
| |
| − | * Jayyusi, Lena (1991) ‘Values and moral judgement: communicative praxis as moral order’. In: G. Button, ed. Ethnomethodology and the human sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 227-51
| |
| − | * Lena Jayyusi, Catégorisation et Ordre Moral. Tr. Michel Barthélémy. Collection Études Sociologiques. Paris: Economica (Translation of Jayyusi, 1984)
| |
| − | * Kilby, Laura; Ava D. Horowitz (2013) ‘Opening up terrorism talk: The sequential and categorical production of discursive power within the call openings of a talk radio broadcast’, Discourse Society 24: 725-742
| |
| − | * Kim, Kwang-ki; Tim Berard. 2009) ‘Typification in society and social science: The continuing relevance of Schutz’s social phenomenology’, Human Studies 32/33: 263-89
| |
| − | * Kitzinger, Celia (2005) Heteronormativity in action: Reproducing normative heterosexuality in ‘after hours’ calls to the doctor, Social Problems52(4). Special Section: Language Interaction and Social Problems, 477-98
| |
| − | * Kitzinger, Celia (2005) ’“Speaking as a Heterosexual”: (How) Does Sexuality Matter for Talk-in-Interaction?’, Research on Language & Social Interaction 38: 221-65
| |
| − | * Klein, Gabriella, Isabella Paoletti, eds. (2002) In & Out. Procedure conversazionali e strategie comunicative di inclusione e di esclusione[In & Out. Conversational procedure and comunicative strategies of inclusion and exclusion]. Napoli: Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane.
| |
| − | * Land, Victoria, Celia Kitzinger (2005) ‘Speaking as a Lesbian: Correcting the Heterosexist Presumption’, Research on Language & Social Interaction4: 371-416
| |
| − | * Land, Victoria; Celia Kitzinger (2011) ‘Categories in talk-in-interaction: gendering speaker and recipient’. In: Susan A. Speer, Elizabeth Stokoe, eds. Conversation and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 48-63
| |
| − | * Lawrence, Samuel G. (1996). ‘Normalizing stigmatized practices: Achieving co-membership by ‘‘doing being ordinary’’ . Research on Language and Social Interaction, 29/3: 181–218.
| |
| − | * Lee, John R. E.(1984) ’Innocent victims and evil-doers.’ Women’s Studies International Forum 7: 69–83.
| |
| − | * Lepper, Georgia (2000) Categories in text and talk: a practical introduction to categorization analysis. London: Sage
| |
| − | * Leudar, Ivan, Nekvapil, J. (2000) ‘Presentations of Romanies in the Czech media: On category work in television debates’, Discourse and Society, 11, 488-513
| |
| − | * Leudar, Ivan, Jacqueline Hayes, Jirí Nekvapil, and Johanna Turner Baker (2008) ‘Hostility themes in media, community and refugee narratives’,Discourse & Society 19: 187-221.
| |
| − | * Logan Klein, Noa (2011) ‘Doing gender categorization: non-recognitional person reference and the omnirelevance of gender’. In: Susan A. Speer, Elizabeth Stokoe, eds. Conversation and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 64-82
| |
| − | * Lloyd, Mike (2011) ‘Miss Grimshaw and the White Elephant: Categorisation in a risqué humour competition’. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 24/1: 63-86
| |
| − | * Lynch, Michael, David Bogen (1997) ‘Lies, recollections and categorical judgements in testimony’. In: Hester, S., P. Eglin, eds., Culture in action: studies in membership categorization analysis. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America: 99-122
| |
| − | * McCabe, Scott, Elizabeth H. Stokoe (2004) ‘Place and identity in ’day visitor’ narratives. Annals of Tourism Research, 31 (3), 601-622
| |
| − | * Maheux-Pelletier, Geneviève, Andrea Golato (2008) ‘Repair in membership categorization in French’, Language in Society 37/5: 689-712
| |
| − | * Maynard, Douglas W.(2011) ‘On ‘‘interactional semantics’’ and problems of meaning’, Human Studies, 34/2: 199–207
| |
| − | * Mazeland, Harrie (1994) ‘Descriptieve praktijken. Pragmatische analyse van categoriseringen’.
| |
| − | * In F. Maes et al., eds., Perspectieven in taalbeheersingsonderzoek. Dordrecht: ICG Publications: 267-279
| |
| − | * Mazeland, Harrie (2003) ‘A politician’s sociology. US Vice President Gore’s categorization of the participants in the Warsaw Uprising’. in: T. Ensink & C. Sauer (eds) The art of commemoration. Fifty years after the Warsaw Uprising. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins: 95-115
| |
| − | * Mazeland, Harrie, Jan Berenst (2008) ’Sorting pupils in a report-card meeting: Categorization in a situated activity system’, Text & Talk28|1: 55-78
| |
| − | * Mazeland, Harrie, Marjan Huisman, Marca Schasfoort (1995) ‘Negotiating categories in travel agency calls’. In: A. Firth, ed. The discourse of negotiation: studies of language in the workplace. Oxford: Pergamon: 271-97
| |
| − | * Mazeland, Harrie, Titus Ensink (2001) ‘Categorizing in discourse: The case of Dutch ander.’ In: M.Bax & J-W.Zwart (eds.) Reflections on language and language learning. (In honour of Arthur van Essen.) Amsterdam / Philadelphia: Benjamins: 141-53
| |
| − | * Moerman, Michael (1968) ‘Being Lue: uses and abuses of ethnic identification’. In: J. Helm, ed.
| |
| − | * Essays on the problem of tribe. University of Washington Press, reprinted as ‘Accomplishing ethnicity’ in: Turner, R., ed., Ethnomethodology: selected readings. Harmondsworth: Penguin 1974: 54-68
| |
| − | * Mondada, Lorenza (1997) ‘La construction discursive de catégories’. In: D. Dubois (éd.)Catégorisation et cognition: de la perception au discours. Paris: Kimé: 291-313
| |
| − | * Mondada, Lorenza (1999) ‘L’accomplissement de l’ “étrangéité” dans et par l’interaction: procédures de catégorisation des locuteurs [The accomplishment of ‘foreign-ness’ in and through interaction: prodedures for the categorization of speakers in interaction]’, Langages34, N. 134: 20-34
| |
| − | * Mondada, Lorenza (2002). “La ville n’est pas peuplée d’êtres anonymes : Processus de catégorisation et espace urbain”, Marges Linguistiques, 3, mai. ( http://www.marges-linguistiques.com ).
| |
| − | * Mondada, Lorenza (2002) ‘Processi di categorizzazione e produzione dell’inclusione e dell’esclusione a proposito di una riunione di lavoro tramite videoconferenza’. In: Klein, Gabriella, Isabella Paoletti, eds. (2002) In & Out. Procedure conversazionali e strategie comunicative di inclusione e di esclusione.Napoli: Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane: 117-75.MCA
| |
| − | * Mondada, Lorenza, Danièle Dubois, (1995) ‘Construction des objets de discours et catégorisation: Une approche des processus de référenciation’,.Tranel23: 273-302.
| |
| − | * Mori, Junko (2007) ‘Reconstructing the participants’ treatments of “interculturality”: variations in data and methodologies’, Pragmatics 17: 123-41
| |
| − | * Nekvapil, J. (1997) ’Die kommunikatieve Überwindung der tschechisch-deutschen etnischen Polarisation: Deutsche, deutsche Kollegen, Expatriatesund andere soziale Kategorien im Automobilwerk Škoda’ [The communicative overcoming of the Tschech/German ethnic polarization: Germans, German colleagues, expatriates and other social categories in the Škoda car factory]. In: S. Höhne, M. Nekula (Hgg.), Sprache, Wirtschaft, Kultur: Deatsche und Tschechen in Interaktion. München: Iudicium: 127-45
| |
| − | * Nikander, Pirjo (2000) “Old” versus “Little Girl”: A discursive approach to age categorisation and morality. Journal of Aging Studies 14/4: 335-358.
| |
| − | * Nikander, Pirjo (2002) Age in action: Membership work and stage of life categories in talk. Helsinki, Finnish Academy of Science and Letters
| |
| − | * Nikander, Pirjo (2009) ‘Doing change and continuity. Age identity and the micro-macro divide’,
| |
| − | * Ageing & Society 29: 863-881.
| |
| − | * Paoletti, Isabella (1998) ’Handling “incoherence” according to speaker’s on-sight categorization’. In: Charles Antaki and Sue Widdicombe (ed.) Identities in Talk. London: Sage
| |
| − | * Paoletti, Isabella (2001) ‘Membership Categories and Time Appraisal in Interviews with Family Caregivers of Disabled Elderly’, Human Studies24: 293-325
| |
| − | * Paoletti, Isabella (2002) ‘Essere impopolare: la constructione conversationale dell’esclusione’. In: Klein, Gabriella, Isabella Paoletti, eds. (2002)In & Out. Procedure conversazionali e strategie comunicative di inclusione e di esclusione. Napoli: Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane: 27-55
| |
| − | * Pomerantz, Anita, Jenny Mandelbaum (2005) ‘Conversation analytic approaches to the relevance and uses of relationship categories in interaction’. In K. L. Fitch & R. E. Sanders, eds., Handbook of language and social interaction Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum: 149-71
| |
| − | * Psathas, George (1999) ‘Studying the organization in action: Membership categorization and interaction’, Human Studies 22: 139-62 (Also published in Japanese in Culture and Society: International Journal of the Human Sciences, 2000, Vol. 2, pp. 37-73; and in W.W. Sharrock, M. Lynch, eds. Ethnomethodology, Sage Publications, 2010)
| |
| − | * Psathas, George, (2003) ‘Types, typifications and membership categorization devices: Alfred Schutz and Harvey Sacks on the notion of types’, Focus Pragensis III, Prague: Center for Phenomenological Research, 28-51
| |
| − | * Rapley Tim (2012) ‘Order, order: A ‘modest’ response to Stokoe’, Discourse Studies 14:
| |
| | | | |
| − | 321-328
| + | We are in the process of digitizing this bibliography. If you would like to help - please check whether the items have been added to the site by searching for them in the PDF linked above... if not, why not [[how to help |help out]] by adding them yourself! |
| − | * Rautajoki, Hanna (2009) ‘Staging public discussion: mobilizing political community in closing discussion programmes’. In. Richard Fitzgerald,William Housley, eds. Media, Policy and Interaction. Farnham, Surey, U.K.: Ashgate: 73-94
| |
| − | * Relieu, Marc (1994) ’Les catégories dans l’action: l’apprentissage des traversées de rue par des non-voyants’ [Categories in action: learning to cross the street by blind persons]. In: B. Fradin, L. Quéré, J. Widmer, eds. (1994) L’enquête sur les catégories.Paris: École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales [Raisons pratiques: Épistémologie, sociologie, théorie sociale/5]: 185-218
| |
| − | * Rendle-Short, Johanna (2009) ‘Doing ’public policy’ in the political news interview’. In. Richard Fitzgerald,William Housley, eds. Media, Policy and Interaction. Farnham, Surey, U.K.: Ashgate: 95-114
| |
| − | * Roca-Cuberes, Carles (2008) ‘Membership categorization and professional insanity ascription’, Discourse Studies 10: 543-570.
| |
| − | * Roulston Kathryn (2014) ‘Interactional problems in research interviews’, Qualitative Research 14: 277-293
| |
| − | * Ryan, Anne, David Silverman (2000) ‘Marking boundaries: culture as category work’,
| |
| − | * Qualitative Inquiry 6: 107-28
| |
| − | * Sacks, Harvey (1967) ‘The search for help: no one to turn to’. In: E.S. Shneidman, ed. Essays in selfdestruction. New York: Science House: 20323
| |
| − | * Sacks, Harvey (1972 a) ‘An initial investigation of the usability of conversational data for doing sociology’. In: D. Sudnow, ed. Studies in social interaction. New York: Free Press: 31-74
| |
| − | * Sacks, Harvey (1972 b) ‘On the analyzability of stories by children’. In: J.J. Gumperz, & D. Hymes, ed. Directions in sociolinguistics: the ethnography of communication. New York: Rinehart & Winston: 325-45
| |
| − | * Sacks, Harvey (1979) ‘Hotrodder: a revolutionary category’. In: G. Psathas, ed., Everyday language: studies in ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington: 7-14
| |
| − | * Sacks, Harvey (1992) Lectures on conversation. 2 vols. Edited by Gail Jefferson with introductions by Emanuel A. Schegloff. Oxford: Basil Blackwell
| |
| − | * Schegloff, Emanuel A. (2007) ‘A tutorial on membership categorization’,Journal of Pragmatics 39: 462-82
| |
| − | * Schegloff, Emanuel A. (2007) ’Categories in action: person-reference and membership categorization’, Discourse Studies 9: 433-461.
| |
| − | * Schubert, Sarah J.; Susan Hansen; Kyle R. Dyer; Mark Rapley )2009) ’“ADHD patient” or “illicit drug user”? Managing medico-moral membership categories in drug dependence services’, Discourse & Society 20: 499-516
| |
| − | * Silverman, David (1998) Harvey Sacks: Social Science and Conversation Analysis. Oxford: Policy Press [chapters 5 & 7]
| |
| − | * Silverman, David (2006) Interpreting qualitative data: methods for analysing talk, text and interaction. Third edition. London: Sage
| |
| − | * Silverman David (2012) ‘Beyond armed camps: A response to Stokoe’, Discourse Studies 14/3: 329-336
| |
| − | * Smith, Dorothy.E. (1978) ‘“K is mentally ill”: the anatomy of a factual account’,Sociology 12: 23-53
| |
| − | * Sloboda, Marián (2009) ‘Styling for hegemony: the West as an enemy (and the ideal) in Belarusian television news’. In. Richard Fitzgerald,William Housley, eds. Media, Policy and Interaction. Farnham, Surey, U.K.: Ashgate: 137-60
| |
| − | * Stetson, Jeff (1999) ‘Victim, offender and witness in the emplotment of news stories’. In: P.L. Jalbert, (Ed.) Media Studies: Ethnomethodological Approaches. Lanham, New York, Oxford: University Press of America: 77-110
| |
| − | * Stockill, Clare, Celia Kitzinger (2007) ’Gendered “People”: how linguistically non-gendered terms can have gendered interactional relevance’, Feminism & Psychology 17(2): 224-36.
| |
| − | * Stokoe, Elizabeth H. (1998) ‘Talking about gender: the conversational construction of gender categories in academic discourse’, Discourse & Society, 9 (2), 217-40 [also i In J. Potter, ed., (2007) Discourse and psychology. London: Sage]
| |
| − | * Stokoe, Elisabeth H. (2000) ‘Towards a conversation analytic approach to gender and discourse’,
| |
| − | * Feminism and Psychology 10: 552-63
| |
| − | * Stokoe, Elisabeth.H. (2003) ‘Mothers, single women and sluts: gender, morality and membership categorisation in neighbour disputes’, Feminism and Psychology 13: 317-44
| |
| − | * Stokoe, Elizabeth H. (2003) ’Doing gender, doing categorization: Recent developments in language and gender research. International Sociolinguistics, 2(1) Online at: http://www.crisaps.org/newsletter/backissue/stokoe_back.pdf
| |
| − | * Stokoe, Elizabeth H. (2004) ‘Gender and discourse, gender and categorization: Current developments in language and gender research’, Qualitative Research in Psychology 1 (2), 107-29
| |
| − | * Stokoe, Elisabeth (2006) On ethnomethodology, feminism, and the analysis of categorial reference to gender in talk-in-interaction’, Sociological Review 54: 467-94
| |
| − | * Stokoe, Elizabeth(2009) ‘Doing actions with identity categories: complaints and denials in neighbor disputes’, Text & Talk 29/1: 75-97
| |
| − | * Stokoe, Elizabeth; ed. (2012) Special issue on ‘Categories and Social Interaction: Current Issues in Membership Categorization’, Discourse Studies 14/3
| |
| − | * Stokoe, Elizabeth (2012) ‘Moving forward with membership categorization analysis: Methods for systematic analysis’, Discourse Studies 14/3: 277-303
| |
| − | * Stokoe Elizabeth (2012) ‘Categorial systematics’, Discourse Studies 14/3: 345-354,
| |
| − | * Stokoe, Elisabeth H., Janet Smithson (2001) ‘Making gender relevant: conversation analysis and gender categories in interaction’, Discourse & Society 12:243-69
| |
| − | * Stokoe, Elisabeth H., Janet Smithson (2002) ’Gender and sexuality in talk-in-interaction: Considering a conversation analytic perspective’. In P. McIlvenny (Ed.), Talking gender and sexuality: Conversation, performativity and discourse in interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 79-110
| |
| − | * Summerville, Jennifer, Barbara Adkins (2007) ‘Enrolling the citizen in sustainability: membership categorization, morality and civic participation’,Humand Studies 30/4: 429-446
| |
| − | * Vallis, Rhyll (2001) ’Applying membership categorization analysis to chat-room talk’. In: A. McHoul and M. Rapley (eds), How to Analyse Talk in Institutional Settings: A Casebook of Methods. London: Continuum, 86-99
| |
| − | * Van De Mieroop, Dorien (2008) ‘Co-constructing identities in speeches: How the construction of an ‘other’ identity is defining for the ‘self’ identity and vice versa’, Pragmatics 18:3.491-509
| |
| − | * Van De Mieroop, Dorien; Jonathan Clifton (2012) ‘The interactional negotiation of group membership and ethnicity: The case of an interview with a former slave’, Discourse & Society 23: 163-183
| |
| − | * Velkovska, Julia; Zouinar Moustafa (2012) ‘Jugements et émotions dans les interactions institutionnelles’, ethnographiques.org, n° 25 - décembre ‘Filmer le travail : chercher, montrer, démontrer’ [on-line; http://www.ethnographiques.org/2012/Velkovska,Zouinar]
| |
| − | * Watson, D. Rodney (1976) ‘Some conceptual issues in the social identification of victims and Offenders.’ In: Emilio C. Viano, ed. Victims and Society. Washington, DC: Visage,
| |
| − | * Watson, D.Rod (1978) ‘Categorization, authorization and blame negotiation in conversation’,Sociology 5: 105-13
| |
| − | * Watson, D.Rod (1983) ‘The presentation of victim and motive in discourse: the case of police interrogations and interviews’, Victimology 8: 31-52 [reprinted in: Travers, M. & J.F. Manzo, eds. (1997) Law in Action: Ethnomethodological & Conversation Analytic Approaches to Law. Aldershot, UK: Dartmouth Publishing Co.: 77-97]
| |
| − | * Watson, Rod (1994) ‘Catégories, séquentialité et ordre social: un nouveau regard sur l’oeuvre de Sacks’. In: B. Fradin, L. Quéré, J. Widmer, eds. (1994) L’enquête sur les catégories. Paris: École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales [Raisons pratiques: Épistémologie, sociologie, théorie sociale/5]: 151-84
| |
| − | * Watson, Rod (1997) ‘Some general reflections on ’Categorization’ and ‘Sequence’ in the analysis of conversation’. In: Hester, S., P. Eglin, eds., Culture in action: studies in membership categorization analysis. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America: 49-76
| |
| − | * Watson, D. Rodney, T.S. Weinberg (1982) ‘Interviews and the interactional construction of accounts of homosexual identity’, Social Analysis 11: 56-78
| |
| − | * Watson, Patrick, Christian Greiffenhagen (2009) ‘Press scrums: some preliminary observations’. In. Richard Fitzgerald,William Housley, eds.Media, Policy and Interaction. Farnham, Surey, U.K.: Ashgate: 115- 36
| |
| − | * Whitehead, Kevin A. (2009) ‘“Categorizing the categorizer”: The management of racial common sense in interaction’, Social Psychology Quarterly, 72/4: 325-342
| |
| − | * Whitehead, Kevin A. (2011) ‘An ethnomethodological, conversation analytic approach to investigating race in South Africa’, South African Review of Sociology, 42/3: 1-22
| |
| − | * Whitehead, Kevin A. (2012) ‘Racial categories as resources and constraints in everyday interactions: Implications for non-racialism in post-apartheid South Africa’, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 35/7: 1248-1265
| |
| − | * Whitehead Kevin A. (2012) ‘Moving forward by doing analysis’,Discourse Studies 14: 337-343
| |
| − | * Whitehead, Kevin A. (2013) ‘Managing self/other relations in complaint sequences: the use of self-deprecating and affiliative racial categorizations’, Research on Language & Social Interaction, 46/2: 186-203
| |
| − | * Widdicombe, Sue, Robin Wooffitt (1995) The language of youth subcultures: social identity in action. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf
| |
| − | * Widmer, Jean (2001) ‘Catégorisation, tours de parole et sociologie’. In: Fornel, Michel de, Albert Ogien, Louis Quéré (dir.) L’ethnométhodologie: une sociologie radicale [Colloque de Cerisy]. Paris: Editions La Découverte [Collection “Recherches”]: 207-38
| |
| − | * Wilkinson, Sue (2011) ‘Constructing ethnicity statistics in talk-in-interaction: Producing the “White European”’, Discourse & Society 22: 343-361,
| |
| − | * Wooffitt, Robin (1992) Telling tales of the unexpected: the organization of factual discourse. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf
| |
| − | * Wowk, Maria T. (1984) ‘Blame allocation, sex and gender in a murder Interrogation’, Women’s Studies International Forum 7: 75-82
| |
| − | * Wowk, Maria T., Andrew P. Carlin (2004 ) ‘Depicting a Liminal Position in Ethnomethodology, Conversation Analysis and Membership Categorization Analysis: The Work of Rod Watson’
| |
| − | * Human Studies 27: 69–89
| |
| − | * Zimmerman, Erica (2007) ‘Constructing Korean and Japanese interculturality in talk: ethnic membership categorization among users of Japanese’, Pragmatics17: 71-94
| |
