Difference between revisions of "Jefferson1985a"
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) m |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
|URL=http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=2992864 | |URL=http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=2992864 | ||
|DOI=10.1017/S0047404500011465 | |DOI=10.1017/S0047404500011465 | ||
− | |Note= | + | |Note=Reprinted, with an introduction, in: Gail Jefferson (2015) Talking About Troubles in Conversation, Oxford U.P.: 127-164. |
− | |Abstract=In the reporting of a situation or event, a speaker can sometimes be seen to have omitted or ‘glossed over’ a constituent component. There are times when that component is something a speaker would rather not have the coparticipant know. Sometimes, however, the speaker is willing, indeed eager, to share this material with the coparticipant, but is constrained from simply producing it then and there (the matter being possibly bizarre, risqué, or in other ways problematic). In either case, whether the problematic component is delivered or not (i.e., whether a ‘gloss’ is ‘unpackaged’) can depend upon what the coparticipant does. This report focuses on the ways in which a coparticipant's activities are implicated in the maintaining as-is, or unpackaging, of a ‘glossed’ component. | + | |Abstract=In the reporting of a situation or event, a speaker can sometimes be seen to have omitted or ‘glossed over’ a constituent component. There are times when that component is something a speaker would rather not have the coparticipant know. Sometimes, however, the speaker is willing, indeed eager, to share this material with the coparticipant, but is constrained from simply producing it then and there (the matter being possibly bizarre, risqué, or in other ways problematic). In either case, whether the problematic component is delivered or not (i.e., whether a ‘gloss’ is ‘unpackaged’) can depend upon what the coparticipant does. This report focuses on the ways in which a coparticipant's activities are implicated in the maintaining as-is, or unpackaging, of a ‘glossed’ component. |
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 23:46, 20 October 2019
Jefferson1985a | |
---|---|
BibType | ARTICLE |
Key | Jefferson1985a |
Author(s) | Gail Jefferson |
Title | On the interactional unpacking of a “gloss” |
Editor(s) | |
Tag(s) | EMCA |
Publisher | |
Year | 1985 |
Language | |
City | |
Month | |
Journal | Language in Society |
Volume | 14 |
Number | 4 |
Pages | 435–466 |
URL | Link |
DOI | 10.1017/S0047404500011465 |
ISBN | |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | |
Howpublished | |
Book title | |
Chapter |
Abstract
In the reporting of a situation or event, a speaker can sometimes be seen to have omitted or ‘glossed over’ a constituent component. There are times when that component is something a speaker would rather not have the coparticipant know. Sometimes, however, the speaker is willing, indeed eager, to share this material with the coparticipant, but is constrained from simply producing it then and there (the matter being possibly bizarre, risqué, or in other ways problematic). In either case, whether the problematic component is delivered or not (i.e., whether a ‘gloss’ is ‘unpackaged’) can depend upon what the coparticipant does. This report focuses on the ways in which a coparticipant's activities are implicated in the maintaining as-is, or unpackaging, of a ‘glossed’ component.
Notes
Reprinted, with an introduction, in: Gail Jefferson (2015) Talking About Troubles in Conversation, Oxford U.P.: 127-164.