Difference between revisions of "Gill2010"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Virginia Teas Gill; Anita Pomerantz; Paul Denvir |Title=Pre-emptive Resistance: Patients' Participation in Diagnostic Sense-Making Activ...")
 
Line 2: Line 2:
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|Author(s)=Virginia Teas Gill; Anita Pomerantz; Paul Denvir
 
|Author(s)=Virginia Teas Gill; Anita Pomerantz; Paul Denvir
|Title=Pre-emptive Resistance: Patients' Participation in Diagnostic Sense-Making Activities
+
|Title=Preemptive Resistance: Patients' Participation in Diagnostic Sense-Making Activities
 
|Tag(s)=medical EMCA; patient participation; doctor-patient interaction; explanation; diagnosis
 
|Tag(s)=medical EMCA; patient participation; doctor-patient interaction; explanation; diagnosis
 
|Key=Gill2010
 
|Key=Gill2010

Revision as of 15:55, 2 February 2016

Gill2010
BibType ARTICLE
Key Gill2010
Author(s) Virginia Teas Gill, Anita Pomerantz, Paul Denvir
Title Preemptive Resistance: Patients' Participation in Diagnostic Sense-Making Activities
Editor(s)
Tag(s) medical EMCA, patient participation, doctor-patient interaction, explanation, diagnosis
Publisher
Year 2010
Language
City
Month
Journal Sociology of Health & Illness
Volume 32
Number 1
Pages 1–20
URL Link
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2009.01208.x
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

In medical clinic visits, patients do more than convey information about their symptoms and problems so doctors can diagnose and treat them. Patients may also show how they have made sense of their health problems and may press doctors to interpret their problems in certain ways. Using conversation analysis, we analyse a practice patients use early in the medical visit to show that relatively benign or commonplace interpretations of their symptoms are implausible. In this practice, which we term pre-emptive resistance, patients raise candidate explanations for their symptoms and then report circumstances that undermine these explanations. By raising candidate explanations on their own and providing evidence against them, patients call for doctors to restrict the range of diagnostic hypotheses they might otherwise consider. However, the practice does not compel doctors to transparently indicate whether they will do so. Patients also display their ability to recognise and weigh the evidence for common, easily remedied causes of their symptoms. By presenting evidence against them, they show doctors the relevance of more serious diagnostic interpretations without pressing for them outright.

Notes