Difference between revisions of "Manzo2005"
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=John Manzo |Title=Social Control and the Management of "Personal" Space in Shopping Malls |Tag(s)=EMCA; shopping malls; |Key=Manzo2005...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
|Author(s)=John Manzo | |Author(s)=John Manzo | ||
− | |Title=Social | + | |Title=Social control and the management of “personal” space in shopping malls |
− | |Tag(s)=EMCA; shopping malls; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; shopping malls; |
|Key=Manzo2005 | |Key=Manzo2005 | ||
|Year=2005 | |Year=2005 | ||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|Number=1 | |Number=1 | ||
|Pages=83–97 | |Pages=83–97 | ||
− | |URL= | + | |URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1206331204265991 |
|DOI=10.1177/1206331204265991 | |DOI=10.1177/1206331204265991 | ||
|Abstract=This study concerns behaviors of persons in planned spaces, namely, enclosed shopping malls, with particular interest in practices conducive to social control in those settings. As an ethnomethodological investigation, it addresses lived social experiences of actors in these sites and not only the deliberate agendas of security firms. Its focus is how persons orient to design elements of shopping malls—corridors, furniture, and flooring—and how these design features are construable as “players” in those contexts. The author examines how design can militate techniques of social-interactional management produced by actors themselves, sometimes unforeseen in architects’ or designers’ plans. This research suggests a broadening of the notion of social control beyond formal and informal human sources to include the physical features of spaces, spaces like shopping malls, and not only of prisons or similar institutions. This study advises that inanimate objects and the spaces that comprise them are informative for and relevant to behaviors of human interactants. | |Abstract=This study concerns behaviors of persons in planned spaces, namely, enclosed shopping malls, with particular interest in practices conducive to social control in those settings. As an ethnomethodological investigation, it addresses lived social experiences of actors in these sites and not only the deliberate agendas of security firms. Its focus is how persons orient to design elements of shopping malls—corridors, furniture, and flooring—and how these design features are construable as “players” in those contexts. The author examines how design can militate techniques of social-interactional management produced by actors themselves, sometimes unforeseen in architects’ or designers’ plans. This research suggests a broadening of the notion of social control beyond formal and informal human sources to include the physical features of spaces, spaces like shopping malls, and not only of prisons or similar institutions. This study advises that inanimate objects and the spaces that comprise them are informative for and relevant to behaviors of human interactants. | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 10:35, 3 November 2019
Manzo2005 | |
---|---|
BibType | ARTICLE |
Key | Manzo2005 |
Author(s) | John Manzo |
Title | Social control and the management of “personal” space in shopping malls |
Editor(s) | |
Tag(s) | EMCA, shopping malls |
Publisher | |
Year | 2005 |
Language | |
City | |
Month | |
Journal | Space and Culture |
Volume | 8 |
Number | 1 |
Pages | 83–97 |
URL | Link |
DOI | 10.1177/1206331204265991 |
ISBN | |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | |
Howpublished | |
Book title | |
Chapter |
Abstract
This study concerns behaviors of persons in planned spaces, namely, enclosed shopping malls, with particular interest in practices conducive to social control in those settings. As an ethnomethodological investigation, it addresses lived social experiences of actors in these sites and not only the deliberate agendas of security firms. Its focus is how persons orient to design elements of shopping malls—corridors, furniture, and flooring—and how these design features are construable as “players” in those contexts. The author examines how design can militate techniques of social-interactional management produced by actors themselves, sometimes unforeseen in architects’ or designers’ plans. This research suggests a broadening of the notion of social control beyond formal and informal human sources to include the physical features of spaces, spaces like shopping malls, and not only of prisons or similar institutions. This study advises that inanimate objects and the spaces that comprise them are informative for and relevant to behaviors of human interactants.
Notes