Difference between revisions of "AntakiCrompton2015"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) m |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Author(s)=Charles Antaki; Rebecca J. Crompton | |Author(s)=Charles Antaki; Rebecca J. Crompton | ||
|Title=Conversational practices promoting a discourse of agency for adults with intellectual disabilities | |Title=Conversational practices promoting a discourse of agency for adults with intellectual disabilities | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; Activities; agency; conversation; discourse empowerment; intellectual disability; personal control; questions; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; Activities; agency; conversation; discourse empowerment; intellectual disability; personal control; questions; |
|Key=AntakiCrompton2015 | |Key=AntakiCrompton2015 | ||
|Year=2015 | |Year=2015 | ||
| + | |Language=English | ||
|Journal=Discourse & Society | |Journal=Discourse & Society | ||
|Volume=26 | |Volume=26 | ||
|Number=6 | |Number=6 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=645–661 |
| − | |URL= | + | |URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0957926515592774 |
|DOI=10.1177/0957926515592774 | |DOI=10.1177/0957926515592774 | ||
|Abstract=In a qualitative study of 50 hours of videotapes of interactions between staff and adults with intellectual disabilities, in two different service environments, we identified conversational practices that arguably promoted – or failed to promote – a discourse of service-users’ personal agency in how they carried out everyday activities. Staff could treat the service-user as an autonomous, self-directed social individual by (a) casting the activity in which they were engaged as being located in a meaningful overall framework, (b) designing their turns at talk as suggestions and requests for the service-user to follow as a matter of choice and (c) implying a joint purpose shared between service-user and a larger group in which he or she was a stakeholder. We discuss these findings in light of recent developments in the drive to empower service-users who have intellectual disabilities. | |Abstract=In a qualitative study of 50 hours of videotapes of interactions between staff and adults with intellectual disabilities, in two different service environments, we identified conversational practices that arguably promoted – or failed to promote – a discourse of service-users’ personal agency in how they carried out everyday activities. Staff could treat the service-user as an autonomous, self-directed social individual by (a) casting the activity in which they were engaged as being located in a meaningful overall framework, (b) designing their turns at talk as suggestions and requests for the service-user to follow as a matter of choice and (c) implying a joint purpose shared between service-user and a larger group in which he or she was a stakeholder. We discuss these findings in light of recent developments in the drive to empower service-users who have intellectual disabilities. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 10:18, 16 December 2019
| AntakiCrompton2015 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | AntakiCrompton2015 |
| Author(s) | Charles Antaki, Rebecca J. Crompton |
| Title | Conversational practices promoting a discourse of agency for adults with intellectual disabilities |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Conversation Analysis, Activities, agency, conversation, discourse empowerment, intellectual disability, personal control, questions |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2015 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Discourse & Society |
| Volume | 26 |
| Number | 6 |
| Pages | 645–661 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1177/0957926515592774 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
In a qualitative study of 50 hours of videotapes of interactions between staff and adults with intellectual disabilities, in two different service environments, we identified conversational practices that arguably promoted – or failed to promote – a discourse of service-users’ personal agency in how they carried out everyday activities. Staff could treat the service-user as an autonomous, self-directed social individual by (a) casting the activity in which they were engaged as being located in a meaningful overall framework, (b) designing their turns at talk as suggestions and requests for the service-user to follow as a matter of choice and (c) implying a joint purpose shared between service-user and a larger group in which he or she was a stakeholder. We discuss these findings in light of recent developments in the drive to empower service-users who have intellectual disabilities.
Notes
