Difference between revisions of "AntakiCrompton2015"
MeaPopoviciu (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Charles Antaki; Rebecca J. Crompton |Title=Conversational practices promoting a discourse of agency for adults with intellectual disabi...") |
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| − | |Author(s)=Charles Antaki; Rebecca J. Crompton | + | |Author(s)=Charles Antaki; Rebecca J. Crompton |
|Title=Conversational practices promoting a discourse of agency for adults with intellectual disabilities | |Title=Conversational practices promoting a discourse of agency for adults with intellectual disabilities | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=Conversation Analysis; Activities; agency; conversation; discourse empowerment; intellectual disability; personal control; questions | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; Activities; agency; conversation; discourse empowerment; intellectual disability; personal control; questions; |
|Key=AntakiCrompton2015 | |Key=AntakiCrompton2015 | ||
|Year=2015 | |Year=2015 | ||
Revision as of 08:45, 6 December 2015
| AntakiCrompton2015 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | AntakiCrompton2015 |
| Author(s) | Charles Antaki, Rebecca J. Crompton |
| Title | Conversational practices promoting a discourse of agency for adults with intellectual disabilities |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Conversation Analysis, Activities, agency, conversation, discourse empowerment, intellectual disability, personal control, questions |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2015 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Discourse & Society |
| Volume | 26 |
| Number | 6 |
| Pages | 645-661 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1177/0957926515592774 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
In a qualitative study of 50 hours of videotapes of interactions between staff and adults with intellectual disabilities, in two different service environments, we identified conversational practices that arguably promoted – or failed to promote – a discourse of service-users’ personal agency in how they carried out everyday activities. Staff could treat the service-user as an autonomous, self-directed social individual by (a) casting the activity in which they were engaged as being located in a meaningful overall framework, (b) designing their turns at talk as suggestions and requests for the service-user to follow as a matter of choice and (c) implying a joint purpose shared between service-user and a larger group in which he or she was a stakeholder. We discuss these findings in light of recent developments in the drive to empower service-users who have intellectual disabilities.
Notes
