Difference between revisions of "Egbert1996"
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Maria Egbert; |Title=Context sensitivity in conversation analysis: Eye gaze and the German repair initiator "bitte" |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conve...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| − | |Author(s)=Maria Egbert; | + | |Author(s)=Maria Egbert; |
|Title=Context sensitivity in conversation analysis: Eye gaze and the German repair initiator "bitte" | |Title=Context sensitivity in conversation analysis: Eye gaze and the German repair initiator "bitte" | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; Context; Cross-linguistic; Eye gaze; Repair; German; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; Context; Cross-linguistic; Eye gaze; Repair; German; |
|Key=Egbert1996 | |Key=Egbert1996 | ||
|Year=1996 | |Year=1996 | ||
|Journal=Language in Society | |Journal=Language in Society | ||
|Volume=25 | |Volume=25 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Number=4 |
| + | |Pages=587–612 | ||
|URL=http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=4193100&fileId=S0047404500020820 | |URL=http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=4193100&fileId=S0047404500020820 | ||
| − | |DOI= | + | |DOI=10.1017/S0047404500020820 |
|Abstract=Just as turn-taking has been found to be both context-free and context-sensitive (Sacks, Schegloff & Jefferson 1974), the organization of repair is also shown here to be both context-free and context-sensitive. In a comparison of American and German conversation, repair can be shown to be context-free in that, basically, the same mechanism can be found across these two languages. However, repair is also sensitive to the linguistic inventory of a given language; in German, morphological marking, syntactic constraints, and grammatical congruity across turns are used as interactional resources. In addition, repair is sensitive to certain characteristics of social situations. The selection of a particular repair initiator, German bitte? ‘pardon?’, indexes that there is no mutual gaze between interlocutors; i.e., there is no common course of action. The selection of bitte? not only initiates repair; it also spurs establishment of mutual gaze, and thus displays that there is attention to a common focus. (Conversation analysis, context, cross-linguistic analysis, repair, gaze, telephone conversation, co-present interaction, grammar and interaction) | |Abstract=Just as turn-taking has been found to be both context-free and context-sensitive (Sacks, Schegloff & Jefferson 1974), the organization of repair is also shown here to be both context-free and context-sensitive. In a comparison of American and German conversation, repair can be shown to be context-free in that, basically, the same mechanism can be found across these two languages. However, repair is also sensitive to the linguistic inventory of a given language; in German, morphological marking, syntactic constraints, and grammatical congruity across turns are used as interactional resources. In addition, repair is sensitive to certain characteristics of social situations. The selection of a particular repair initiator, German bitte? ‘pardon?’, indexes that there is no mutual gaze between interlocutors; i.e., there is no common course of action. The selection of bitte? not only initiates repair; it also spurs establishment of mutual gaze, and thus displays that there is attention to a common focus. (Conversation analysis, context, cross-linguistic analysis, repair, gaze, telephone conversation, co-present interaction, grammar and interaction) | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 05:37, 13 February 2016
| Egbert1996 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Egbert1996 |
| Author(s) | Maria Egbert |
| Title | Context sensitivity in conversation analysis: Eye gaze and the German repair initiator "bitte" |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Conversation Analysis, Context, Cross-linguistic, Eye gaze, Repair, German |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 1996 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Language in Society |
| Volume | 25 |
| Number | 4 |
| Pages | 587–612 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1017/S0047404500020820 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Just as turn-taking has been found to be both context-free and context-sensitive (Sacks, Schegloff & Jefferson 1974), the organization of repair is also shown here to be both context-free and context-sensitive. In a comparison of American and German conversation, repair can be shown to be context-free in that, basically, the same mechanism can be found across these two languages. However, repair is also sensitive to the linguistic inventory of a given language; in German, morphological marking, syntactic constraints, and grammatical congruity across turns are used as interactional resources. In addition, repair is sensitive to certain characteristics of social situations. The selection of a particular repair initiator, German bitte? ‘pardon?’, indexes that there is no mutual gaze between interlocutors; i.e., there is no common course of action. The selection of bitte? not only initiates repair; it also spurs establishment of mutual gaze, and thus displays that there is attention to a common focus. (Conversation analysis, context, cross-linguistic analysis, repair, gaze, telephone conversation, co-present interaction, grammar and interaction)
Notes
