Difference between revisions of "SzczepekReed-Raymond2013"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(abstract + doi)
m (collection)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{BibEntry
 
{{BibEntry
|BibType=BOOK
+
|BibType=COLLECTION
|Author(s)=Beatrice Szczepek Reed; Geoffrey Raymond, eds.
 
 
|Title=Units of Talk – Units of Action
 
|Title=Units of Talk – Units of Action
 +
|Editor(s)=Beatrice Szczepek Reed; Geoffrey Raymond
 
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Units
 
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Units
 
|Key=SzczepekReed-Raymond2013
 
|Key=SzczepekReed-Raymond2013
Line 9: Line 9:
 
|Address=Amsterdam / Philadelphia
 
|Address=Amsterdam / Philadelphia
 
|DOI=10.1075/slsi.25
 
|DOI=10.1075/slsi.25
|Abstract=In this volume leading academics in Interactional Linguistics and Conversation Analysis consider the notion of units for the study of language and interaction. Amongst the issues being explored are the role and relevance of traditionally accepted linguistic units for the analysis of naturally occurring talk, and the identification of new units of conduct in interaction. While some chapters make suggestions on how existing linguistic units can be adapted to suit the study of conversation, others present radically new perspectives on how language in interaction should be described, conceptualised and researched. The chapters present empirical investigations into different languages (Danish, English, Japanese, Mandarin, Swedish) in a variety of settings (private and institutional), considering both linguistic and embodied resources for talk. In addressing the fundamental question of units, the volume pushes at the boundaries of current debates and contributes original new insight into the nature of language in interaction.  
+
|Abstract=In this volume leading academics in Interactional Linguistics and Conversation Analysis consider the notion of units for the study of language and interaction. Amongst the issues being explored are the role and relevance of traditionally accepted linguistic units for the analysis of naturally occurring talk, and the identification of new units of conduct in interaction. While some chapters make suggestions on how existing linguistic units can be adapted to suit the study of conversation, others present radically new perspectives on how language in interaction should be described, conceptualised and researched. The chapters present empirical investigations into different languages (Danish, English, Japanese, Mandarin, Swedish) in a variety of settings (private and institutional), considering both linguistic and embodied resources for talk. In addressing the fundamental question of units, the volume pushes at the boundaries of current debates and contributes original new insight into the nature of language in interaction.
 
}}
 
}}

Revision as of 12:46, 11 September 2017

SzczepekReed-Raymond2013
BibType COLLECTION
Key SzczepekReed-Raymond2013
Author(s)
Title Units of Talk – Units of Action
Editor(s) Beatrice Szczepek Reed, Geoffrey Raymond
Tag(s) EMCA, Units
Publisher John Benjamins
Year 2013
Language
City Amsterdam / Philadelphia
Month
Journal
Volume
Number
Pages
URL
DOI 10.1075/slsi.25
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

In this volume leading academics in Interactional Linguistics and Conversation Analysis consider the notion of units for the study of language and interaction. Amongst the issues being explored are the role and relevance of traditionally accepted linguistic units for the analysis of naturally occurring talk, and the identification of new units of conduct in interaction. While some chapters make suggestions on how existing linguistic units can be adapted to suit the study of conversation, others present radically new perspectives on how language in interaction should be described, conceptualised and researched. The chapters present empirical investigations into different languages (Danish, English, Japanese, Mandarin, Swedish) in a variety of settings (private and institutional), considering both linguistic and embodied resources for talk. In addressing the fundamental question of units, the volume pushes at the boundaries of current debates and contributes original new insight into the nature of language in interaction.

Notes