Difference between revisions of "Hopper2015"
(BibTeX auto import 2015-03-23 12:28:42) |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
+ | |BibType=INCOLLECTION | ||
+ | |Author(s)=Paul J. Hopper; | ||
+ | |Title=Temporality and the emergence of a construction: a discourse approach to sluicing | ||
+ | |Editor(s)=Arnulf Deppermann; Susanne Günthner; | ||
+ | |Tag(s)=Interactional Linguistics; sluice; temporality; turn construction | ||
|Key=Hopper2015 | |Key=Hopper2015 | ||
− | | | + | |Publisher=John Benjamins |
− | | | + | |Year=2015 |
− | | | + | |Language=English |
− | | | + | |Address=Amsterdam/Philadelphia |
− | |||
|Booktitle=Temporality in Interaction | |Booktitle=Temporality in Interaction | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
|Pages=123–146 | |Pages=123–146 | ||
+ | |URL=https://benjamins.com/catalog/slsi.27.04hop | ||
|DOI=10.1075/slsi.27.04hop | |DOI=10.1075/slsi.27.04hop | ||
|Abstract=A sluice (Ross 1969) is a wh-word that, in the standard syntactic view, refers to ellipted material in an antecedent clause. In the present study, based on conversational data, I view sluices from a temporal and interactional perspective in which grammatical constructions are seen as emergent in time rather than as fixed stable entities. I analyze the different timings of sluices in terms of their projective, retractive, preemptive and other functions. Pre-sluices are forward-oriented and work to block potential questions that might distract from a current or upcoming theme. Post-sluices are “retractions” (cf. Auer 2009) that close off a completed turn or a sequence of turns. | |Abstract=A sluice (Ross 1969) is a wh-word that, in the standard syntactic view, refers to ellipted material in an antecedent clause. In the present study, based on conversational data, I view sluices from a temporal and interactional perspective in which grammatical constructions are seen as emergent in time rather than as fixed stable entities. I analyze the different timings of sluices in terms of their projective, retractive, preemptive and other functions. Pre-sluices are forward-oriented and work to block potential questions that might distract from a current or upcoming theme. Post-sluices are “retractions” (cf. Auer 2009) that close off a completed turn or a sequence of turns. | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 11:11, 15 December 2019
Hopper2015 | |
---|---|
BibType | INCOLLECTION |
Key | Hopper2015 |
Author(s) | Paul J. Hopper |
Title | Temporality and the emergence of a construction: a discourse approach to sluicing |
Editor(s) | Arnulf Deppermann, Susanne Günthner |
Tag(s) | Interactional Linguistics, sluice, temporality, turn construction |
Publisher | John Benjamins |
Year | 2015 |
Language | English |
City | Amsterdam/Philadelphia |
Month | |
Journal | |
Volume | |
Number | |
Pages | 123–146 |
URL | Link |
DOI | 10.1075/slsi.27.04hop |
ISBN | |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | |
Howpublished | |
Book title | Temporality in Interaction |
Chapter |
Abstract
A sluice (Ross 1969) is a wh-word that, in the standard syntactic view, refers to ellipted material in an antecedent clause. In the present study, based on conversational data, I view sluices from a temporal and interactional perspective in which grammatical constructions are seen as emergent in time rather than as fixed stable entities. I analyze the different timings of sluices in terms of their projective, retractive, preemptive and other functions. Pre-sluices are forward-oriented and work to block potential questions that might distract from a current or upcoming theme. Post-sluices are “retractions” (cf. Auer 2009) that close off a completed turn or a sequence of turns.
Notes