Difference between revisions of "Svennevig2010"
(BibTeX auto import 2015-03-03 02:40:52) |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
| − | | | + | |BibType=ARTICLE |
| − | | | + | |Author(s)=Jan Svennevig; |
|Title=Pre-empting reference problems in conversation | |Title=Pre-empting reference problems in conversation | ||
| − | |||
|Tag(s)=EMCA; expansions; progessivity; reference; turn construction | |Tag(s)=EMCA; expansions; progessivity; reference; turn construction | ||
| − | | | + | |Key=Svennevig2010 |
|Year=2010 | |Year=2010 | ||
|Month=apr | |Month=apr | ||
|Journal=Language in Society | |Journal=Language in Society | ||
|Volume=39 | |Volume=39 | ||
| − | |Number= | + | |Number=2 |
|Pages=173–202 | |Pages=173–202 | ||
|URL=http://www.journals.cambridge.org/abstract\_S0047404510000060 | |URL=http://www.journals.cambridge.org/abstract\_S0047404510000060 | ||
Revision as of 10:26, 17 October 2019
| Svennevig2010 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Svennevig2010 |
| Author(s) | Jan Svennevig |
| Title | Pre-empting reference problems in conversation |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, expansions, progessivity, reference, turn construction |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2010 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | apr |
| Journal | Language in Society |
| Volume | 39 |
| Number | 2 |
| Pages | 173–202 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1017/S0047404510000060 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
The topic of this article is how conversationalists deal with emergent problems of reference in the construction of a turn at talk. It analyzes practices for modifying and expanding a turn-constructional unit in progress to accommodate information that will introduce a referent to the interlocutor or check his or her familiarity with it. One set of practices expands the turn after the referring expression has been produced: apokoinou constructions and appositions. A second, and previously undescribed, practice is identified by which speakers insert referent identification before the referring expression has been produced. In this practice, speakers initiate two separate sentence structures and complete them both by merging them in a common complement. This practice has the advantage of embedding the subordinate activity of establishing reference within the main sentence frame, and furthermore minimizes the disruption of sequential progressivity of the talk. (Turn construction, reference, expansions, apokoinou, apposition, progressivity)
Notes
