Difference between revisions of "Beach2000"
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Wayne A. Beach; |Title=Inviting collaborations in stories about a woman |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; Storytelling; Gossip; Mora...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| − | |Author(s)=Wayne A. Beach; | + | |Author(s)=Wayne A. Beach; |
|Title=Inviting collaborations in stories about a woman | |Title=Inviting collaborations in stories about a woman | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; Storytelling; Gossip; Morality; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; Storytelling; Gossip; Morality; |
|Key=Beach2000 | |Key=Beach2000 | ||
|Year=2000 | |Year=2000 | ||
|Journal=Language in Society | |Journal=Language in Society | ||
|Volume=29 | |Volume=29 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Number=3 |
| + | |Pages=379–407 | ||
| + | |URL=http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=58025 | ||
| + | |Abstract=Stories provide rich environments for understanding how invitations to action, and responses to them, are delicately managed and consequential for shaping just how “the story” evolves as a form of social organization. The present analysis focuses on SEVENTEEN INVITED COLLABORATIONS, as “Two guys” co-author gossip about an absent woman, and on the distinct interactional dilemmas that arise as morally indignant references are occasioned, initially avoided, and yet gradually pursued as resources for escalating affiliation and intimacy. At noticeably risky moments, as the story gets reconfigured – from a reporting about “last night,” to sexualized fantasy enacted through stereotypic portrayals of uneducated Southern males – speakers' intoned and animated VOICES are revealed as methodically deployed, prosodically constructed, and increasingly choral practices for shaping story trajectories: artfully crafted resources for contextualizing and negotiating concerted actions in ordinary conversation. The analysis concludes by addressing the question: Are these gossiping actions “sexist”? | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 15:39, 27 January 2016
| Beach2000 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Beach2000 |
| Author(s) | Wayne A. Beach |
| Title | Inviting collaborations in stories about a woman |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Conversation Analysis, Storytelling, Gossip, Morality |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2000 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Language in Society |
| Volume | 29 |
| Number | 3 |
| Pages | 379–407 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Stories provide rich environments for understanding how invitations to action, and responses to them, are delicately managed and consequential for shaping just how “the story” evolves as a form of social organization. The present analysis focuses on SEVENTEEN INVITED COLLABORATIONS, as “Two guys” co-author gossip about an absent woman, and on the distinct interactional dilemmas that arise as morally indignant references are occasioned, initially avoided, and yet gradually pursued as resources for escalating affiliation and intimacy. At noticeably risky moments, as the story gets reconfigured – from a reporting about “last night,” to sexualized fantasy enacted through stereotypic portrayals of uneducated Southern males – speakers' intoned and animated VOICES are revealed as methodically deployed, prosodically constructed, and increasingly choral practices for shaping story trajectories: artfully crafted resources for contextualizing and negotiating concerted actions in ordinary conversation. The analysis concludes by addressing the question: Are these gossiping actions “sexist”?
Notes
