Difference between revisions of "Niemi2015"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Kreeta Niemi; Amanda Bateman |Title='Cheaters and Stalkers': Accusations in a classroom |Tag(s)=Uncategorized; |Key=Niemi2015 |Year=2015...")
 
Line 3: Line 3:
 
|Author(s)=Kreeta Niemi; Amanda Bateman
 
|Author(s)=Kreeta Niemi; Amanda Bateman
 
|Title='Cheaters and Stalkers': Accusations in a classroom
 
|Title='Cheaters and Stalkers': Accusations in a classroom
|Tag(s)=Uncategorized;
+
|Tag(s)=EMCA; MCA; Classroom; Accountability;  
 
|Key=Niemi2015
 
|Key=Niemi2015
 
|Year=2015
 
|Year=2015
Line 9: Line 9:
 
|Volume=17
 
|Volume=17
 
|Number=1
 
|Number=1
|Pages= 83-98  
+
|Pages=83-98
 
|URL=http://dis.sagepub.com/content/17/1/83.abstract
 
|URL=http://dis.sagepub.com/content/17/1/83.abstract
|DOI=10.1177/1461445614557755  
+
|DOI=10.1177/1461445614557755
|Abstract=This article explores accusations as collaboratively accomplished in classroom peer interactions in the absence of a teacher. The analysis shows how the children use local classroom rules and teacher authority as resources and warrants to invoke multi-layered moral orders and identities, and hold one child accountable through accusations about their behavior. The accused children are categorized in a duplicative way with morally degrading descriptions and as out-group members. This article argues that understanding children’s accusations requires understanding of how such interactions compose and reflect the school context that is co-produced through the implementation of accountable ways in which to behave.  
+
|Abstract=This article explores accusations as collaboratively accomplished in classroom peer interactions in the absence of a teacher. The analysis shows how the children use local classroom rules and teacher authority as resources and warrants to invoke multi-layered moral orders and identities, and hold one child accountable through accusations about their behavior. The accused children are categorized in a duplicative way with morally degrading descriptions and as out-group members. This article argues that understanding children’s accusations requires understanding of how such interactions compose and reflect the school context that is co-produced through the implementation of accountable ways in which to behave.
 
}}
 
}}

Revision as of 09:18, 4 March 2015

Niemi2015
BibType ARTICLE
Key Niemi2015
Author(s) Kreeta Niemi, Amanda Bateman
Title 'Cheaters and Stalkers': Accusations in a classroom
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, MCA, Classroom, Accountability
Publisher
Year 2015
Language
City
Month
Journal Discourse Studies
Volume 17
Number 1
Pages 83-98
URL Link
DOI 10.1177/1461445614557755
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

This article explores accusations as collaboratively accomplished in classroom peer interactions in the absence of a teacher. The analysis shows how the children use local classroom rules and teacher authority as resources and warrants to invoke multi-layered moral orders and identities, and hold one child accountable through accusations about their behavior. The accused children are categorized in a duplicative way with morally degrading descriptions and as out-group members. This article argues that understanding children’s accusations requires understanding of how such interactions compose and reflect the school context that is co-produced through the implementation of accountable ways in which to behave.

Notes