Difference between revisions of "Keevallik2013a"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Leelo Keevallik; |Title=The interdependence of bodily demonstrations and clausal syntax |Tag(s)=EMCA; Interactional Linguistics; Body m...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| − | |Author(s)=Leelo Keevallik; | + | |Author(s)=Leelo Keevallik; |
|Title=The interdependence of bodily demonstrations and clausal syntax | |Title=The interdependence of bodily demonstrations and clausal syntax | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Interactional Linguistics; Body movement; Grammar; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Interactional Linguistics; Body movement; Grammar; |
|Key=Keevallik2013a | |Key=Keevallik2013a | ||
|Year=2013 | |Year=2013 | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|Volume=46 | |Volume=46 | ||
|Number=1 | |Number=1 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=1–21 |
| + | |URL=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08351813.2013.753710 | ||
| + | |DOI=10.1080/08351813.2013.753710 | ||
| + | |Abstract=Units in interaction are emergent real-time phenomena that can be accomplished by the coordinated deployment of language and the body. Focusing mostly on data from dance classes, this study looks at how incomplete syntax projects a continuation realized by the body and systematically accounts for clausal syntax that can incorporate an embodied demonstration. It is argued that the classic list of types of turn constructional units by Sacks et al. (1974) needs to be expanded with a syntactic-bodily one and that the syntax of embodied demonstrations has to be included in the grammatical description of language. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 13:40, 1 March 2016
| Keevallik2013a | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Keevallik2013a |
| Author(s) | Leelo Keevallik |
| Title | The interdependence of bodily demonstrations and clausal syntax |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Interactional Linguistics, Body movement, Grammar |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2013 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Research on Language and Social Interaction |
| Volume | 46 |
| Number | 1 |
| Pages | 1–21 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1080/08351813.2013.753710 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Units in interaction are emergent real-time phenomena that can be accomplished by the coordinated deployment of language and the body. Focusing mostly on data from dance classes, this study looks at how incomplete syntax projects a continuation realized by the body and systematically accounts for clausal syntax that can incorporate an embodied demonstration. It is argued that the classic list of types of turn constructional units by Sacks et al. (1974) needs to be expanded with a syntactic-bodily one and that the syntax of embodied demonstrations has to be included in the grammatical description of language.
Notes
