Difference between revisions of "Reynolds2020b"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=INCOLLECTION |Author(s)=Edward Reynolds; |Title=Respecifying Dualities: The Case of ‘Feel Enquiries’ Used in Sports Coaching |Editor(s)=Sally Wiggins;...")
 
 
Line 4: Line 4:
 
|Title=Respecifying Dualities: The Case of ‘Feel Enquiries’ Used in Sports Coaching
 
|Title=Respecifying Dualities: The Case of ‘Feel Enquiries’ Used in Sports Coaching
 
|Editor(s)=Sally Wiggins; Karin Osvaldsson Cromdal;
 
|Editor(s)=Sally Wiggins; Karin Osvaldsson Cromdal;
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Coaching; Sport
+
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Coaching; Sport; Discursive psychology; Coaching cues; Epistemic rights; Power; Sport communication
 
|Key=Reynolds2020b
 
|Key=Reynolds2020b
 
|Publisher=Palgrave MacMillan
 
|Publisher=Palgrave MacMillan
 
|Year=2020
 
|Year=2020
 
|Language=English
 
|Language=English
 +
|Booktitle=Discursive Psychology and Embodiment: Beyond Subject-Object Binaries
 +
|Pages=139-167
 +
|URL=https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-53709-8_6
 +
|DOI=10.1007/978-3-030-53709-8_6
 
|Abstract=Dualisms, such as the mind-body duality, have pervaded Western thought since antiquity, but they have been regarded as theoretical problems not socially constructed facts. In line with the research tradition of discursive psychology, this chapter uses data from ‘technique coaching’ interactions in sport to explore how participants construct a surface/deep duality as a resource for coaching. This chapter contrasts situations in which coaches and athletes alike take it as unproblematic that a coach might know how an athlete is feeling, with situations in which coaches act as if they do not know and make ‘feel-inquiries’. I argue that these are a resource used to upgrade the athlete’s participation in the coaching feedback process. This chapter demonstrates how dualisms may be enacted as member’s resource.
 
|Abstract=Dualisms, such as the mind-body duality, have pervaded Western thought since antiquity, but they have been regarded as theoretical problems not socially constructed facts. In line with the research tradition of discursive psychology, this chapter uses data from ‘technique coaching’ interactions in sport to explore how participants construct a surface/deep duality as a resource for coaching. This chapter contrasts situations in which coaches and athletes alike take it as unproblematic that a coach might know how an athlete is feeling, with situations in which coaches act as if they do not know and make ‘feel-inquiries’. I argue that these are a resource used to upgrade the athlete’s participation in the coaching feedback process. This chapter demonstrates how dualisms may be enacted as member’s resource.
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 09:08, 11 November 2023

Reynolds2020b
BibType INCOLLECTION
Key Reynolds2020b
Author(s) Edward Reynolds
Title Respecifying Dualities: The Case of ‘Feel Enquiries’ Used in Sports Coaching
Editor(s) Sally Wiggins, Karin Osvaldsson Cromdal
Tag(s) EMCA, Coaching, Sport, Discursive psychology, Coaching cues, Epistemic rights, Power, Sport communication
Publisher Palgrave MacMillan
Year 2020
Language English
City
Month
Journal
Volume
Number
Pages 139-167
URL Link
DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-53709-8_6
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title Discursive Psychology and Embodiment: Beyond Subject-Object Binaries
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

Dualisms, such as the mind-body duality, have pervaded Western thought since antiquity, but they have been regarded as theoretical problems not socially constructed facts. In line with the research tradition of discursive psychology, this chapter uses data from ‘technique coaching’ interactions in sport to explore how participants construct a surface/deep duality as a resource for coaching. This chapter contrasts situations in which coaches and athletes alike take it as unproblematic that a coach might know how an athlete is feeling, with situations in which coaches act as if they do not know and make ‘feel-inquiries’. I argue that these are a resource used to upgrade the athlete’s participation in the coaching feedback process. This chapter demonstrates how dualisms may be enacted as member’s resource.

Notes