Difference between revisions of "Heap1982a"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=James L. Heap; |Title=Practical reasoning in depression: a practice |Tag(s)=EMCA; Ethnomethodology; Depression |Key=Heap1982a |Year=198...") |
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| − | |Author(s)=James L. Heap; | + | |Author(s)=James L. Heap; |
|Title=Practical reasoning in depression: a practice | |Title=Practical reasoning in depression: a practice | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Ethnomethodology; Depression | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Ethnomethodology; Depression; Documentory method of interpretation; |
|Key=Heap1982a | |Key=Heap1982a | ||
|Year=1982 | |Year=1982 | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|Number=4 | |Number=4 | ||
|Pages=345-356 | |Pages=345-356 | ||
| + | |Abstract=The concern of this paper is to describe and analyze the properties of one practice | ||
| + | of practical reasoning as it functions and is embedded in the form of the life and language-game of depression. While depression is the locus of this practice, it will be argued that the practice operates in other forms of life. The practice | ||
| + | can be understood as a constituent of the so-called documentary method of | ||
| + | interpretation (cf. Garfinkel, 1967, pp. 76-103). | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 07:14, 23 June 2016
| Heap1982a | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Heap1982a |
| Author(s) | James L. Heap |
| Title | Practical reasoning in depression: a practice |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Ethnomethodology, Depression, Documentory method of interpretation |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 1982 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Human Studies |
| Volume | 5 |
| Number | 4 |
| Pages | 345-356 |
| URL | |
| DOI | |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
The concern of this paper is to describe and analyze the properties of one practice of practical reasoning as it functions and is embedded in the form of the life and language-game of depression. While depression is the locus of this practice, it will be argued that the practice operates in other forms of life. The practice can be understood as a constituent of the so-called documentary method of interpretation (cf. Garfinkel, 1967, pp. 76-103).
Notes
