Difference between revisions of "Go-ahead"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{Infobox cite | Authors = '''Nathalie Bauer''' (Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Germany) (https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8501-8079) | To cite = Bauer, Nathalie. (2...")
 
Line 13: Line 13:
 
  04  Ch:    I want a cloth to clean (the) windows
 
  04  Ch:    I want a cloth to clean (the) windows
  
With the go-ahead in line 2, Mom invites the child to proceed with what he has been up to after securing her attention in line 1. Hence, the go-ahead sustains the sequential progression (Schegloff 2007: 30; Sorjonen 2002) and can be described as the structurally preferred second-pair part of the pre-sequence (Schegloff 2007: 59). The opposite possibility to react to a first-pair part of a pre-sequence is a '''[[Blocking|blocking]]''' response, with which a speaker inhibits the unfolding of the projected sequential trajectory.  
+
With the go-ahead in line 2, Mom invites the child to proceed with what he has been up to after securing her attention in line 1. Hence, the go-ahead sustains the sequential progression (Schegloff 2007: 30; Sorjonen 2002) and can be described as the structurally preferred '''[[Second-pair part|second-pair part]]''' of the pre-sequence (Schegloff 2007: 59). The opposite possibility to react to a '''[[First-pair part|first-pair part]]''' of a pre-sequence is a '''[[Blocking|blocking]]''' response, with which a speaker inhibits the unfolding of the projected sequential trajectory.  
  
 
In addition to this usage of the term, Zinken and Deppermann (2017) also use the notion of 'go-ahead' to characterize imperatives that speakers use as permissions for (practical) actions by their counterpart.
 
In addition to this usage of the term, Zinken and Deppermann (2017) also use the notion of 'go-ahead' to characterize imperatives that speakers use as permissions for (practical) actions by their counterpart.

Revision as of 17:58, 18 June 2023

Encyclopedia of Terminology for CA and IL: Go-ahead
Author(s): Nathalie Bauer (Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Germany) (https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8501-8079)
To cite: Bauer, Nathalie. (2023). Go-ahead. In Alexandra Gubina, Elliott M. Hoey & Chase Wesley Raymond (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Terminology for Conversation Analysis and Interactional Linguistics. International Society for Conversation Analysis (ISCA). DOI:


A go-ahead is a type of response that occurs in pre-sequences and encourages the prior speaker to proceed with the action projected in first position (Schegloff 2007: 30; Schegloff 1980: 106). An instance of such a go-ahead in a generic pre-sequence (in this case, a summons-answer sequence) can be found in this extract from Atkinson and Drew (1979):

(Atkinson & Drew 1979: 46)

01  Ch:    Mummy 
02  M:  -> Yes dear
03         (2.1)
04  Ch:    I want a cloth to clean (the) windows

With the go-ahead in line 2, Mom invites the child to proceed with what he has been up to after securing her attention in line 1. Hence, the go-ahead sustains the sequential progression (Schegloff 2007: 30; Sorjonen 2002) and can be described as the structurally preferred second-pair part of the pre-sequence (Schegloff 2007: 59). The opposite possibility to react to a first-pair part of a pre-sequence is a blocking response, with which a speaker inhibits the unfolding of the projected sequential trajectory.

In addition to this usage of the term, Zinken and Deppermann (2017) also use the notion of 'go-ahead' to characterize imperatives that speakers use as permissions for (practical) actions by their counterpart.


Additional Related Entries:


Cited References:

Atkinson, J. M., & Drew, P. (1979). Order in Court: The Organisation of Verbal Interaction in Judicial Settings. Macmillan.

Deppermann, A., & Zinken, J. (2017). A cline of visible commitment in the situated design of imperative turns. Evidence from German and Polish. In M.-L. Sorjonen, L. Raevaara, E. Couper-Kuhlen (Eds.), Imperative Turns at Talk: The Design of Directives in Action. (pp. 37–63). John Benjamins.

Schegloff, E. A. (1980). Preliminaries to Preliminaries: ‘Can I Ask You a Question?’. Sociological Inquiry, 50, 104–52.

Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence Organization: A Primer in Conversation Analysis (Volume 1). Cambridge University Press.

Sorjonen, M.-L. (2002). Recipient Activities: The Particle No as a Go-Ahead Response in Finnish Conversations. In C. E. Ford, B. A. Fox, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), The Language of Turn and Sequence (pp. 165–95). Oxford University Press.


Additional References:


EMCA Wiki Bibliography items tagged with 'go-ahead'