Difference between revisions of "Post-first insert expansion (sequence)"
ChaseRaymond (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Infobox cite | Authors = '''Olivia H. Marrese''' (University of Colorado, Boulder) (https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6162-267X) | To cite = Marrese, Olivia H. (2023). Post-first...") |
ChaseRaymond (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
(Schegloff, et al. 1977: 367) | (Schegloff, et al. 1977: 367) | ||
− | 01 A: | + | 01 A: Were you uh you were in therapy with a private |
− | 02 | + | 02 doctor? |
− | 03 B: | + | 03 B: Yah. |
− | 04 A: ''F<sub>b</sub>''-> Have you ever tried a clinic? | + | 04 A: ''F<sub>b</sub>''-> Have you ever tried a clinic? |
− | 05 B: ''F<sub>ins</sub>''-> <u>What?</u> | + | 05 B: ''F<sub>ins</sub>''-> <u>What?</u> |
− | 06 A: ''S<sub>ins</sub>''-> Have you ever tried a clinic? | + | 06 A: ''S<sub>ins</sub>''-> Have you ever tried a clinic? |
− | 07 B: ''S<sub>b</sub>''-> ((''sigh'')) No, I don’t want to go to a clinic. | + | 07 B: ''S<sub>b</sub>''-> ((''sigh'')) No, I don’t want to go to a clinic. |
After speaker A responds to the first-pair part of the post-first insert sequence by repeating the original question (line 6), speaker B then produces the base second-pair part (line 7). In this case, the post-first insert sequence is launched with an '''[[Open-class repair initiation|open-class repair]]''' initiator (“What”, line 5; see Drew 1997; Kendrick 2015; Schegloff 1997), but post-first insert sequences can be formed via a number of other resources (see '''[[Other-initiated_repair (OIR)|other-initiated repair]]'''). In this sense, post-first insert sequences are “generic” because they are not dependent on the type of preceding sequence (Schegloff 2007: 106); instead they are delineated based on the system of other-initiated repair. | After speaker A responds to the first-pair part of the post-first insert sequence by repeating the original question (line 6), speaker B then produces the base second-pair part (line 7). In this case, the post-first insert sequence is launched with an '''[[Open-class repair initiation|open-class repair]]''' initiator (“What”, line 5; see Drew 1997; Kendrick 2015; Schegloff 1997), but post-first insert sequences can be formed via a number of other resources (see '''[[Other-initiated_repair (OIR)|other-initiated repair]]'''). In this sense, post-first insert sequences are “generic” because they are not dependent on the type of preceding sequence (Schegloff 2007: 106); instead they are delineated based on the system of other-initiated repair. |
Revision as of 14:57, 17 June 2023
Encyclopedia of Terminology for CA and IL: Post-first insert expansion (sequence) | |
---|---|
Author(s): | Olivia H. Marrese (University of Colorado, Boulder) (https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6162-267X) |
To cite: | Marrese, Olivia H. (2023). Post-first insert expansion (sequence). In Alexandra Gubina, Elliott M. Hoey & Chase Wesley Raymond (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Terminology for Conversation Analysis and Interactional Linguistics. International Society for Conversation Analysis (ISCA). DOI: [] |
A 'post-first' insert expansion (sequence) is an insert sequence that occurs after a first-pair part has been produced, but before the second-pair part, and is directed towards an issue with the first pair part. The issue at hand may “interfere with the production of an appropriate response to it [the first-pair part], or even grasping what an appropriate type of response would be” (Schegloff 2007: 102). As such, the recipient of the initial action initiates repair on that action, and after the resolution, issues the second-pair part that was originally due. For example, in the following case from Schegloff, et al. (1977: 367), speaker A produces a first-pair part in line 4. Rather than answering the question, speaker B launches a post-first insert sequence in line 5.
(Schegloff, et al. 1977: 367) 01 A: Were you uh you were in therapy with a private 02 doctor? 03 B: Yah. 04 A: Fb-> Have you ever tried a clinic? 05 B: Fins-> What? 06 A: Sins-> Have you ever tried a clinic? 07 B: Sb-> ((sigh)) No, I don’t want to go to a clinic.
After speaker A responds to the first-pair part of the post-first insert sequence by repeating the original question (line 6), speaker B then produces the base second-pair part (line 7). In this case, the post-first insert sequence is launched with an open-class repair initiator (“What”, line 5; see Drew 1997; Kendrick 2015; Schegloff 1997), but post-first insert sequences can be formed via a number of other resources (see other-initiated repair). In this sense, post-first insert sequences are “generic” because they are not dependent on the type of preceding sequence (Schegloff 2007: 106); instead they are delineated based on the system of other-initiated repair.
Additional Related Entries:
- Adjacency pair
- Insert expansion (sequence)
- Pre-second insert expansion
- First-pair part
- Second-pair part
- Other-initiated repair
- Repair
- Sequence
Cited References:
Clift, R. (2016). Conversation Analysis. Cambridge University Press.
Drew, P. (1997). ‘Open’-class repair initiators in response to sequential sources of troubles in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 28(1), 69–101.
Kendrick, K. H. (2015). Other-initiated repair in English. Open Linguistics, 1(1). 164-190.
Schegloff, E. A. (1997). Practices and actions: Boundary cases of other‐initiated repair. Discourse Processes, 23(3), 499–545.
Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis (Vol. 1). Cambridge University Press.
Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53(2), 361–382.
Additional References:
Benjamin, T. & Mazeland, H. (2013). Other-initiated repair. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics (pp. 1068-1075). Wiley-Blackwell.
Benjamin, T., Mazeland, H., & Fox, B. A. (2013). Conversation analysis and repair organization: Overview. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics (pp. 1094-1097). Wiley-Blackwell.