Difference between revisions of "Henderson2022a"
JakubMlynar (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Elle Felicity Henderson; |Title=‘So, it’s not necessarily about exclusion’: Category use in naturally occurring transphobic talk |...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Author(s)=Elle Felicity Henderson; | |Author(s)=Elle Felicity Henderson; | ||
|Title=‘So, it’s not necessarily about exclusion’: Category use in naturally occurring transphobic talk | |Title=‘So, it’s not necessarily about exclusion’: Category use in naturally occurring transphobic talk | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Transphobia; Conversation analysis; Interview; Gender; Membership categorization analysis; Membership categorisation analysis; MCA; Discrimination; Social interaction | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Transphobia; Conversation analysis; Interview; Gender; Membership categorization analysis; Membership categorisation analysis; MCA; Discrimination; Social interaction |
|Key=Henderson2022a | |Key=Henderson2022a | ||
|Year=2022 | |Year=2022 | ||
|Language=English | |Language=English | ||
|Journal=Journal of Language and Discrimination | |Journal=Journal of Language and Discrimination | ||
| + | |Volume=6 | ||
| + | |Number=2 | ||
| + | |Pages=213–240 | ||
|URL=https://journal.equinoxpub.com/JLD/article/view/21376 | |URL=https://journal.equinoxpub.com/JLD/article/view/21376 | ||
|DOI=10.1558/jld.21376 | |DOI=10.1558/jld.21376 | ||
|Abstract=Trans-exclusionary radical feminists challenge transgender people (specifically women) from within a claimed feminist struggle. They exclude transgender women and instead claim they are men colonising women’s spaces. I present a conversation analytic and analytical membership categorisation case study of a national radio interview in which the spokesperson for a trans-exclusionary feminist political group debates with the host on the nature of trans women and their exclusion from women’s spaces. I show how the interviewee accomplishes trans exclusion in talk,, often without making explicit claims about trans women, by constructing both biologically essentialist and experiential distinctions between trans and cis women, constructing trans women as participants in patriarchal oppression, and by problematising a claimed redefinition of the category woman being enacted by trans women. This analysis highlights how transphobic (and specifically transmisogynistic) attitudes are accomplished in social interaction through sequential action and categorial inferences. | |Abstract=Trans-exclusionary radical feminists challenge transgender people (specifically women) from within a claimed feminist struggle. They exclude transgender women and instead claim they are men colonising women’s spaces. I present a conversation analytic and analytical membership categorisation case study of a national radio interview in which the spokesperson for a trans-exclusionary feminist political group debates with the host on the nature of trans women and their exclusion from women’s spaces. I show how the interviewee accomplishes trans exclusion in talk,, often without making explicit claims about trans women, by constructing both biologically essentialist and experiential distinctions between trans and cis women, constructing trans women as participants in patriarchal oppression, and by problematising a claimed redefinition of the category woman being enacted by trans women. This analysis highlights how transphobic (and specifically transmisogynistic) attitudes are accomplished in social interaction through sequential action and categorial inferences. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 01:25, 30 October 2022
| Henderson2022a | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Henderson2022a |
| Author(s) | Elle Felicity Henderson |
| Title | ‘So, it’s not necessarily about exclusion’: Category use in naturally occurring transphobic talk |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Transphobia, Conversation analysis, Interview, Gender, Membership categorization analysis, Membership categorisation analysis, MCA, Discrimination, Social interaction |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2022 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Journal of Language and Discrimination |
| Volume | 6 |
| Number | 2 |
| Pages | 213–240 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1558/jld.21376 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Trans-exclusionary radical feminists challenge transgender people (specifically women) from within a claimed feminist struggle. They exclude transgender women and instead claim they are men colonising women’s spaces. I present a conversation analytic and analytical membership categorisation case study of a national radio interview in which the spokesperson for a trans-exclusionary feminist political group debates with the host on the nature of trans women and their exclusion from women’s spaces. I show how the interviewee accomplishes trans exclusion in talk,, often without making explicit claims about trans women, by constructing both biologically essentialist and experiential distinctions between trans and cis women, constructing trans women as participants in patriarchal oppression, and by problematising a claimed redefinition of the category woman being enacted by trans women. This analysis highlights how transphobic (and specifically transmisogynistic) attitudes are accomplished in social interaction through sequential action and categorial inferences.
Notes
