Difference between revisions of "Hutchinson2022"
JakubMlynar (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Phil Hutchinson; |Title=Stigma respecified: Investigating HIV stigma as an interactional phenomenon |Tag(s)=EMCA; Medical ethics; Philos...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Author(s)=Phil Hutchinson; | |Author(s)=Phil Hutchinson; | ||
|Title=Stigma respecified: Investigating HIV stigma as an interactional phenomenon | |Title=Stigma respecified: Investigating HIV stigma as an interactional phenomenon | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Medical ethics; Philosophy of medicine; Situation analysis | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Medical ethics; Philosophy of medicine; Situation analysis |
|Key=Hutchinson2022 | |Key=Hutchinson2022 | ||
|Year=2022 | |Year=2022 | ||
|Language=English | |Language=English | ||
|Journal=Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice | |Journal=Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice | ||
| + | |Volume=28 | ||
| + | |Number=5 | ||
| + | |Pages=861–866 | ||
|URL=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jep.13724 | |URL=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jep.13724 | ||
|DOI=10.1111/jep.13724 | |DOI=10.1111/jep.13724 | ||
|Abstract=In this paper, I discuss stigma, understood as a category which includes acknowledged, enacted degradation, discreditation and discrimination. My discussion begins with an analysis of HIV stigma, as discussed in a social media post on Twitter. I then analyse a fictionalized clinical stigma scenario. These two analyses are undertaken to highlight aspects of the conceptual anatomy and interactional dynamics of stigma and by extension shame. Brief social media declarations and short, fictionalized clinical interactions are rich with information which helps us understand how stigma—degradation, discreditation and discrimination—is operationalized in interaction. | |Abstract=In this paper, I discuss stigma, understood as a category which includes acknowledged, enacted degradation, discreditation and discrimination. My discussion begins with an analysis of HIV stigma, as discussed in a social media post on Twitter. I then analyse a fictionalized clinical stigma scenario. These two analyses are undertaken to highlight aspects of the conceptual anatomy and interactional dynamics of stigma and by extension shame. Brief social media declarations and short, fictionalized clinical interactions are rich with information which helps us understand how stigma—degradation, discreditation and discrimination—is operationalized in interaction. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 23:51, 5 October 2022
| Hutchinson2022 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Hutchinson2022 |
| Author(s) | Phil Hutchinson |
| Title | Stigma respecified: Investigating HIV stigma as an interactional phenomenon |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Medical ethics, Philosophy of medicine, Situation analysis |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2022 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice |
| Volume | 28 |
| Number | 5 |
| Pages | 861–866 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1111/jep.13724 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
In this paper, I discuss stigma, understood as a category which includes acknowledged, enacted degradation, discreditation and discrimination. My discussion begins with an analysis of HIV stigma, as discussed in a social media post on Twitter. I then analyse a fictionalized clinical stigma scenario. These two analyses are undertaken to highlight aspects of the conceptual anatomy and interactional dynamics of stigma and by extension shame. Brief social media declarations and short, fictionalized clinical interactions are rich with information which helps us understand how stigma—degradation, discreditation and discrimination—is operationalized in interaction.
Notes
