Difference between revisions of "Nekvapil2002a"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Jiří Nekvapil; Ivan Leudar; |Title=Sekvenční struktury v mediálních dialogických sítích |Tag(s)=EMCA; Sequential Structure; Dia...")
 
m
Line 13: Line 13:
 
|URL=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/253872700_Sekvencni_struktury_v_medialnich_dialogickych_sitich
 
|URL=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/253872700_Sekvencni_struktury_v_medialnich_dialogickych_sitich
 
|DOI=10.13060/00380288.2002.38.4.06
 
|DOI=10.13060/00380288.2002.38.4.06
|Abstract=Sequential Structures in Media Dialogical Networks Abstract: 'Dialogical networks' are communications which occur in mass media. One of their characteristics is that contributions of individual actors - politicians, journal- ists, representatives of pressure groups, etc. - are distributed in time and space. (A politi- cian can, for instance, react in the media to what another politician expressed publi- cally elsewhere). Another central property of dialogical networks is that an individ- ual's contribution to a network can be duplicated, or even multiplicated (e.g. what is said in a TV studio may be reproduced in several newspapers). Dialogical networks are in certain respects like everyday conversations, but they also have unique characteris- tics. Working in a broadly ethnomethodological and conversation analytical frame- work, we focus on two aspects of sequential organisation - adjacency pair structures and repair structures, with the aim to clarify the respects in which they differ in dia- logical networks and in everyday conversations.
+
|Abstract='Dialogical networks' are communications which occur in mass media. One of their characteristics is that contributions of individual actors - politicians, journal- ists, representatives of pressure groups, etc. - are distributed in time and space. (A politi- cian can, for instance, react in the media to what another politician expressed publi- cally elsewhere). Another central property of dialogical networks is that an individ- ual's contribution to a network can be duplicated, or even multiplicated (e.g. what is said in a TV studio may be reproduced in several newspapers). Dialogical networks are in certain respects like everyday conversations, but they also have unique characteris- tics. Working in a broadly ethnomethodological and conversation analytical frame- work, we focus on two aspects of sequential organisation - adjacency pair structures and repair structures, with the aim to clarify the respects in which they differ in dia- logical networks and in everyday conversations.
 
}}
 
}}

Revision as of 21:23, 14 June 2022

Nekvapil2002a
BibType ARTICLE
Key Nekvapil2002a
Author(s) Jiří Nekvapil, Ivan Leudar
Title Sekvenční struktury v mediálních dialogických sítích
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Sequential Structure, Dialogical Networks, Media
Publisher
Year 2002
Language Czech
City
Month
Journal Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review
Volume 38
Number 4
Pages 483–499
URL Link
DOI 10.13060/00380288.2002.38.4.06
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

'Dialogical networks' are communications which occur in mass media. One of their characteristics is that contributions of individual actors - politicians, journal- ists, representatives of pressure groups, etc. - are distributed in time and space. (A politi- cian can, for instance, react in the media to what another politician expressed publi- cally elsewhere). Another central property of dialogical networks is that an individ- ual's contribution to a network can be duplicated, or even multiplicated (e.g. what is said in a TV studio may be reproduced in several newspapers). Dialogical networks are in certain respects like everyday conversations, but they also have unique characteris- tics. Working in a broadly ethnomethodological and conversation analytical frame- work, we focus on two aspects of sequential organisation - adjacency pair structures and repair structures, with the aim to clarify the respects in which they differ in dia- logical networks and in everyday conversations.

Notes