Difference between revisions of "Reber2021"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(BibTeX auto import 2021-12-17 08:02:06)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{BibEntry
 
{{BibEntry
 +
|BibType=BOOK
 +
|Author(s)=Elisabeth Reber;
 +
|Title=Quoting in Parliamentary Question Time: Exploring Recent Change
 +
|Tag(s)=English language; Great Britain; Indirect discourse; Language; Legislators; Linguistic change; Prime ministers; EMCA
 
|Key=Reber2021
 
|Key=Reber2021
|Key=Reber2021
+
|Publisher=Cambridge University Press
|Title=Quoting in parliamentary question time: exploring recent change
+
|Year=2021
|Author(s)=Elisabeth Reber;  
+
|Language=English
|Tag(s)=English language; Great Britain; Indirect discourse; Language; Legislators; Linguistic change; Prime ministers; EMCA
+
|Address=Cambridge, UK; New York
 +
|URL=https://www.cambridge.org/ru/academic/subjects/languages-linguistics/history-english-language/quoting-parliamentary-question-time-exploring-recent-change
 
|ISBN=978-1-108-86989-8
 
|ISBN=978-1-108-86989-8
|BibType=BOOK
 
 
|Series=Studies in English language
 
|Series=Studies in English language
|Publisher=Cambridge University Press
 
|Address=Cambridge, UK ; New York
 
|Year=2021
 
 
|Abstract=Language change in contemporary English represents a burgeoning field and has primarily been studied from a corpus-linguistic perspective since the mid-1990s (e.g., Hundt and Mair 1999; Leech et al. 2009; Mair 2006; Mair and Leech 2006). Despite relevant article-length investigations on historical recordings from the perspectives of Historical Pragmatics (Jucker and Landert 2015) and Conversation Analysis (Clayman and Heritage 2002a; Clayman et al. 2006, 2007; Heritage and Clayman 2013), as well as the acknowledgement of the need for historical spoken corpora in Interactional Linguistics (e.g., Barth-Weingarten 2014; Couper-Kuhlen 2011), questions of recent change in interactional English have nevertheless remained under-researched to date. Because of the lack of suitable recordings, the historical study of recent change in spoken English was not considered to be a methodologically feasible research direction even as little as a decade ago (e.g., Mair 2006: 21). Against this backdrop, the present study breaks new ground in analysing evolving practices in spoken English (here forms of reported speech) based on authentic recordings from different periods–
 
|Abstract=Language change in contemporary English represents a burgeoning field and has primarily been studied from a corpus-linguistic perspective since the mid-1990s (e.g., Hundt and Mair 1999; Leech et al. 2009; Mair 2006; Mair and Leech 2006). Despite relevant article-length investigations on historical recordings from the perspectives of Historical Pragmatics (Jucker and Landert 2015) and Conversation Analysis (Clayman and Heritage 2002a; Clayman et al. 2006, 2007; Heritage and Clayman 2013), as well as the acknowledgement of the need for historical spoken corpora in Interactional Linguistics (e.g., Barth-Weingarten 2014; Couper-Kuhlen 2011), questions of recent change in interactional English have nevertheless remained under-researched to date. Because of the lack of suitable recordings, the historical study of recent change in spoken English was not considered to be a methodologically feasible research direction even as little as a decade ago (e.g., Mair 2006: 21). Against this backdrop, the present study breaks new ground in analysing evolving practices in spoken English (here forms of reported speech) based on authentic recordings from different periods–
 
}}
 
}}

Revision as of 08:56, 18 February 2022

Reber2021
BibType BOOK
Key Reber2021
Author(s) Elisabeth Reber
Title Quoting in Parliamentary Question Time: Exploring Recent Change
Editor(s)
Tag(s) English language, Great Britain, Indirect discourse, Language, Legislators, Linguistic change, Prime ministers, EMCA
Publisher Cambridge University Press
Year 2021
Language English
City Cambridge, UK; New York
Month
Journal
Volume
Number
Pages
URL Link
DOI
ISBN 978-1-108-86989-8
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series Studies in English language
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

Language change in contemporary English represents a burgeoning field and has primarily been studied from a corpus-linguistic perspective since the mid-1990s (e.g., Hundt and Mair 1999; Leech et al. 2009; Mair 2006; Mair and Leech 2006). Despite relevant article-length investigations on historical recordings from the perspectives of Historical Pragmatics (Jucker and Landert 2015) and Conversation Analysis (Clayman and Heritage 2002a; Clayman et al. 2006, 2007; Heritage and Clayman 2013), as well as the acknowledgement of the need for historical spoken corpora in Interactional Linguistics (e.g., Barth-Weingarten 2014; Couper-Kuhlen 2011), questions of recent change in interactional English have nevertheless remained under-researched to date. Because of the lack of suitable recordings, the historical study of recent change in spoken English was not considered to be a methodologically feasible research direction even as little as a decade ago (e.g., Mair 2006: 21). Against this backdrop, the present study breaks new ground in analysing evolving practices in spoken English (here forms of reported speech) based on authentic recordings from different periods–

Notes