Difference between revisions of "Giles2015"
SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) (BibTeX auto import 2021-03-16 02:54:44) |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
| + | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| + | |Author(s)=David Giles; Wyke Stommel; Trena Paulus; Jessica Lester; Darren Reed; | ||
| + | |Title=Microanalysis of Online Data: The Methodological Development of “Digital CA” | ||
| + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Computer-mediated communication; Conversation analysis; Digital media; Online discussion; Online interaction | ||
|Key=Giles2015 | |Key=Giles2015 | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
|Year=2015 | |Year=2015 | ||
| − | |||
|Journal=Discourse, Context & Media | |Journal=Discourse, Context & Media | ||
|Volume=7 | |Volume=7 | ||
|Pages=45–51 | |Pages=45–51 | ||
| + | |URL=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211695814000464 | ||
|DOI=10.1016/j.dcm.2014.12.002 | |DOI=10.1016/j.dcm.2014.12.002 | ||
|Abstract=This paper introduces the work of the MOOD (Microanalysis Of Online Data) network, an interdisciplinary association of academic researchers exploring ways of conducting close qualitative analyses of online interaction. Despite the fact that much online interaction meets the criteria for `conversation', conversation analysis (CA) has only recently begun to grow and flourish as a methodology for analysing the overwhelming quantity of material that in many cases sits in archive form, visible to millions, on the Internet. We discuss the development of methods that are inherently suited for subjecting online interaction to the kind of rigorous analysis that conversation analysts have applied to talk of all kinds for several decades. We go on to explore the fundamental challenges that online data pose for CA, the value of many CA techniques for online analysis, and the possibilities of developing bespoke modes of analysis that are crafted for use with specific forms of online data (e.g. `tweets' on Twitter). | |Abstract=This paper introduces the work of the MOOD (Microanalysis Of Online Data) network, an interdisciplinary association of academic researchers exploring ways of conducting close qualitative analyses of online interaction. Despite the fact that much online interaction meets the criteria for `conversation', conversation analysis (CA) has only recently begun to grow and flourish as a methodology for analysing the overwhelming quantity of material that in many cases sits in archive form, visible to millions, on the Internet. We discuss the development of methods that are inherently suited for subjecting online interaction to the kind of rigorous analysis that conversation analysts have applied to talk of all kinds for several decades. We go on to explore the fundamental challenges that online data pose for CA, the value of many CA techniques for online analysis, and the possibilities of developing bespoke modes of analysis that are crafted for use with specific forms of online data (e.g. `tweets' on Twitter). | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 08:16, 15 February 2022
| Giles2015 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Giles2015 |
| Author(s) | David Giles, Wyke Stommel, Trena Paulus, Jessica Lester, Darren Reed |
| Title | Microanalysis of Online Data: The Methodological Development of “Digital CA” |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Computer-mediated communication, Conversation analysis, Digital media, Online discussion, Online interaction |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2015 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Discourse, Context & Media |
| Volume | 7 |
| Number | |
| Pages | 45–51 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.dcm.2014.12.002 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This paper introduces the work of the MOOD (Microanalysis Of Online Data) network, an interdisciplinary association of academic researchers exploring ways of conducting close qualitative analyses of online interaction. Despite the fact that much online interaction meets the criteria for `conversation', conversation analysis (CA) has only recently begun to grow and flourish as a methodology for analysing the overwhelming quantity of material that in many cases sits in archive form, visible to millions, on the Internet. We discuss the development of methods that are inherently suited for subjecting online interaction to the kind of rigorous analysis that conversation analysts have applied to talk of all kinds for several decades. We go on to explore the fundamental challenges that online data pose for CA, the value of many CA techniques for online analysis, and the possibilities of developing bespoke modes of analysis that are crafted for use with specific forms of online data (e.g. `tweets' on Twitter).
Notes
