Difference between revisions of "Stickle2020"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=INCOLLECTION |Author(s)=Trini Stickle; Anja Wanner |Title=Making Sense of Syntactic Error in Conversations Between Persons with Dementia and Their Non-impa...")
 
 
Line 6: Line 6:
 
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Syntax; Repair; Error; Dementia
 
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Syntax; Repair; Error; Dementia
 
|Key=Stickle2020
 
|Key=Stickle2020
 +
|Publisher=Palgrave Macmillan
 
|Year=2020
 
|Year=2020
 
|Language=English
 
|Language=English
|Booktitle=Learning from the Talk of Persons with Dementia
+
|Address=Cham
 +
|Booktitle=Learning from the Talk of Persons with Dementia: A Practical Guide to Interaction and Interactional Research
 
|Pages=85-109
 
|Pages=85-109
 
|URL=https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-43977-4_6
 
|URL=https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-43977-4_6
|DOI=https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43977-4_6
+
|DOI=10.1007/978-3-030-43977-4_6
 
|Abstract=In this chapter, the authors demonstrate how syntactic analysis combines with interactional methods to form a powerful tool in understanding the language produced by persons with dementia. They discuss the relationship between syntactic structure and interactional behavior in conversations. Specifically, they present two cases of persons with dementia exhibiting great syntactic impairment symptomatic of late-stage dementia. To help caregivers, practitioners, and novice researchers gain a better understanding of the linguistic effects of both dementia and co-participant responses, they examine incidences of speaker error in which co-participants respond to impaired syntax as making sense and the participants with dementia are able to employ better communicative language, if only briefly. From these observations, the authors posit that co-participants’ linguistic and interactional choices may allow syntactic and interactional competency to emerge during interactional collaborations and, as such, serve as possible models of (best) communication practices applicable to home, clinic, and research settings.
 
|Abstract=In this chapter, the authors demonstrate how syntactic analysis combines with interactional methods to form a powerful tool in understanding the language produced by persons with dementia. They discuss the relationship between syntactic structure and interactional behavior in conversations. Specifically, they present two cases of persons with dementia exhibiting great syntactic impairment symptomatic of late-stage dementia. To help caregivers, practitioners, and novice researchers gain a better understanding of the linguistic effects of both dementia and co-participant responses, they examine incidences of speaker error in which co-participants respond to impaired syntax as making sense and the participants with dementia are able to employ better communicative language, if only briefly. From these observations, the authors posit that co-participants’ linguistic and interactional choices may allow syntactic and interactional competency to emerge during interactional collaborations and, as such, serve as possible models of (best) communication practices applicable to home, clinic, and research settings.
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 00:47, 3 July 2023

Stickle2020
BibType INCOLLECTION
Key Stickle2020
Author(s) Trini Stickle, Anja Wanner
Title Making Sense of Syntactic Error in Conversations Between Persons with Dementia and Their Non-impaired Co-participants
Editor(s) Trini Stickle
Tag(s) EMCA, Syntax, Repair, Error, Dementia
Publisher Palgrave Macmillan
Year 2020
Language English
City Cham
Month
Journal
Volume
Number
Pages 85-109
URL Link
DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-43977-4_6
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title Learning from the Talk of Persons with Dementia: A Practical Guide to Interaction and Interactional Research
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

In this chapter, the authors demonstrate how syntactic analysis combines with interactional methods to form a powerful tool in understanding the language produced by persons with dementia. They discuss the relationship between syntactic structure and interactional behavior in conversations. Specifically, they present two cases of persons with dementia exhibiting great syntactic impairment symptomatic of late-stage dementia. To help caregivers, practitioners, and novice researchers gain a better understanding of the linguistic effects of both dementia and co-participant responses, they examine incidences of speaker error in which co-participants respond to impaired syntax as making sense and the participants with dementia are able to employ better communicative language, if only briefly. From these observations, the authors posit that co-participants’ linguistic and interactional choices may allow syntactic and interactional competency to emerge during interactional collaborations and, as such, serve as possible models of (best) communication practices applicable to home, clinic, and research settings.

Notes