Difference between revisions of "Nishizaka2019"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=INCOLLECTION |Author(s)=Aug Nishizaka; |Title=Postscript: Thing and space |Editor(s)=Dennis Day; Johannes Wagner |Tag(s)=EMCA; |Key=Nishizaka2019 |Publishe...")
 
Line 4: Line 4:
 
|Title=Postscript: Thing and space
 
|Title=Postscript: Thing and space
 
|Editor(s)=Dennis Day; Johannes Wagner
 
|Editor(s)=Dennis Day; Johannes Wagner
|Tag(s)=EMCA;
+
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Sensory Things; aspect-seeing; Spatial Things; aspect-perception
 
|Key=Nishizaka2019
 
|Key=Nishizaka2019
 
|Publisher=Multilingual Matters
 
|Publisher=Multilingual Matters

Revision as of 02:26, 12 April 2020

Nishizaka2019
BibType INCOLLECTION
Key Nishizaka2019
Author(s) Aug Nishizaka
Title Postscript: Thing and space
Editor(s) Dennis Day, Johannes Wagner
Tag(s) EMCA, Sensory Things, aspect-seeing, Spatial Things, aspect-perception
Publisher Multilingual Matters
Year 2019
Language English
City Bristol
Month
Journal
Volume
Number
Pages 285-294
URL
DOI
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title Objects, Bodies and Work Practice
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

In this collection, the authors address the organization of interaction in which ‘things’ play specifi c roles. Although the contexts and types of things the authors discuss are diverse, there are some common features. First, they are things locatable in a particular space; they are ‘spatial things’. Secondly, they are real, not imaginary; they are ‘sensory things’. That is, they are visible, tangible, audible, scentable, and the like. Thirdly, they are artifacts, material things invented for a purpose. They have structures that are suitable for a certain distinctive activity, although these structures can serve purposes beyond their original design. In this postscript, I attempt to outline what this volume contributes to the development of the study of how things with the above-mentioned features are perceived in interaction. I fi rst present theoretical characterizations of sensory things whose meaning is emergently constituted in the temporal unfolding of interaction. Next, a holistic view of space as a temporal arrangement of multiple bodies that exhibit orientations to each other and things in the environment of their interaction is presented. In conclusion, I suggest in which directions studies of things in interaction can be further developed.

Notes