Difference between revisions of "Brandt1992"
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) m |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|Key=Brandt1992 | |Key=Brandt1992 | ||
|Year=1992 | |Year=1992 | ||
− | |||
|Journal=Written Communication | |Journal=Written Communication | ||
|Volume=9 | |Volume=9 |
Latest revision as of 13:01, 24 November 2019
Brandt1992 | |
---|---|
BibType | ARTICLE |
Key | Brandt1992 |
Author(s) | Deborah Brandt |
Title | The cognitive as the social: an ethnomethodological approach to writing process research |
Editor(s) | |
Tag(s) | EMCA, Writing |
Publisher | |
Year | 1992 |
Language | |
City | |
Month | |
Journal | Written Communication |
Volume | 9 |
Number | 3 |
Pages | 315–355 |
URL | Link |
DOI | 10.1177/0741088392009003001 |
ISBN | |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | |
Howpublished | |
Book title | |
Chapter |
Abstract
This article explores the uses of ethnomethodology in developing a robust sociocognitive theory of writing. Ethnomethodology, a radical movement in sociology that studies people's sense-making practices, has some parallel interests with cognitive-process research in composition. At the same time, because ethnomethodology is attuned to how sense-making involves organizing social structure, it also shares parallel interests with social-constructionist thought in composition. This article uses ethnomethodological perspectives to translate the language of Flower and Hayes's cognitive theory of writing into a more thoroughly social vocabulary as a way of articulating the role of social context and social structure in individual acts of writing.
Notes