Difference between revisions of "Winship-Muller2011"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Christopher Winship; Christopher Muller; |Title=Ethnomethodology and consequences: comment on Emirbayer and Maynard’s “pragmatism an...")
 
 
Line 2: Line 2:
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|Author(s)=Christopher Winship; Christopher Muller;
 
|Author(s)=Christopher Winship; Christopher Muller;
|Title=Ethnomethodology and consequences: comment on Emirbayer and Maynard’s “pragmatism and ethnomethodology”
+
|Title=Ethnomethodology and consequences: comment on Emirbayer and Maynard’s “Pragmatism and ethnomethodology”
 
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Pragmatism; Ethnomethodology
 
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Pragmatism; Ethnomethodology
 
|Key=Winship-Muller2011
 
|Key=Winship-Muller2011
Line 9: Line 9:
 
|Journal=Qualitative Sociology
 
|Journal=Qualitative Sociology
 
|Volume=34
 
|Volume=34
|Pages=283-286
+
|Number=1
 +
|Pages=283–286
 +
|URL=https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11133-010-9179-4
 
|DOI=10.1007/s11133-010-9179-4
 
|DOI=10.1007/s11133-010-9179-4
|Abstract=Emirbayer and Maynard are to be congratulated for writing an insightful and important
 
paper. They have identified far from transparent connections between pragmatism and
 
ethnomethodology and, perhaps most importantly, shown how ethnomethodology contrib-
 
utes to the pragmatist project by developing a social science methodology with which to
 
carry out its agenda. This is no small accomplishment. This fine paper should inspire a
 
renewed interest among sociologists in the American pragmatist philosophical tradition and
 
a reappraisal of the contributions of Garfinkel’s program in ethnomethodology.
 
In this comment we advance two related criticisms. The first concerns whether
 
pragmatism can be said to have a single method and whether ethnomethodology supplies
 
it. The second questions whether ethnomethodology sufficiently attends to John Dewey’s
 
theory of creative (Joas 1996) or experimental action. We address these in turn.
 
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 13:11, 27 November 2019

Winship-Muller2011
BibType ARTICLE
Key Winship-Muller2011
Author(s) Christopher Winship, Christopher Muller
Title Ethnomethodology and consequences: comment on Emirbayer and Maynard’s “Pragmatism and ethnomethodology”
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Pragmatism, Ethnomethodology
Publisher
Year 2011
Language English
City
Month
Journal Qualitative Sociology
Volume 34
Number 1
Pages 283–286
URL Link
DOI 10.1007/s11133-010-9179-4
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract


Notes