Difference between revisions of "Kristiansen-etal2019"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Elisabeth Dalby Kristiansen; Gitte Rasmussen; Elisabeth Muth Andersen; |Title=Practices for making residents’ wishes fit institutional...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|Volume=44 | |Volume=44 | ||
|Number=1 | |Number=1 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=7–13 |
| − | |URL=https://doi | + | |URL=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14015439.2019.1554851 |
|DOI=10.1080/14015439.2019.1554851 | |DOI=10.1080/14015439.2019.1554851 | ||
|Abstract=Purpose: The study aims to show how practices of manipulation are used by a member of staff in a care situation where the member of staff has to perform two tasks at once. | |Abstract=Purpose: The study aims to show how practices of manipulation are used by a member of staff in a care situation where the member of staff has to perform two tasks at once. | ||
| + | |||
Method: The study is an ethnomethodological conversation analytic single-case study of a care situation in residential dementia care. The analyses are based on video recordings and observations conducted during 9 months of fieldwork at a residential care facility for persons with dementia. | Method: The study is an ethnomethodological conversation analytic single-case study of a care situation in residential dementia care. The analyses are based on video recordings and observations conducted during 9 months of fieldwork at a residential care facility for persons with dementia. | ||
| + | |||
Results: The study details the methods by which a member of staff engages in manipulation by constructing her actions as responses to a resident’s wish which has in fact never been stated. | Results: The study details the methods by which a member of staff engages in manipulation by constructing her actions as responses to a resident’s wish which has in fact never been stated. | ||
| + | |||
Conclusion: The study discusses how manipulation may be understood as care staff practices for making a residents’ wishes fit the institutional constraints they are subjected to and for “doing what is best for the resident.” | Conclusion: The study discusses how manipulation may be understood as care staff practices for making a residents’ wishes fit the institutional constraints they are subjected to and for “doing what is best for the resident.” | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 00:57, 19 January 2020
| Kristiansen-etal2019 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Kristiansen-etal2019 |
| Author(s) | Elisabeth Dalby Kristiansen, Gitte Rasmussen, Elisabeth Muth Andersen |
| Title | Practices for making residents’ wishes fit institutional constraints: a case of manipulation in dementia care |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Dementia, conversation analysis, person-centered care, manipulation |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2019 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology |
| Volume | 44 |
| Number | 1 |
| Pages | 7–13 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1080/14015439.2019.1554851 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Purpose: The study aims to show how practices of manipulation are used by a member of staff in a care situation where the member of staff has to perform two tasks at once.
Method: The study is an ethnomethodological conversation analytic single-case study of a care situation in residential dementia care. The analyses are based on video recordings and observations conducted during 9 months of fieldwork at a residential care facility for persons with dementia.
Results: The study details the methods by which a member of staff engages in manipulation by constructing her actions as responses to a resident’s wish which has in fact never been stated.
Conclusion: The study discusses how manipulation may be understood as care staff practices for making a residents’ wishes fit the institutional constraints they are subjected to and for “doing what is best for the resident.”
Notes
