Difference between revisions of "Goodwin-Salomon2019"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Charles Goodwin; René Salomon; |Title=Not Being Bound by What You Can See Now |Tag(s)=EMCA; co-operative action; embodiment; distribute...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
|Author(s)=Charles Goodwin; René Salomon; | |Author(s)=Charles Goodwin; René Salomon; | ||
| − | |Title=Not | + | |Title=Not being bound by what you can see now: Charles Goodwin in conversation with René Salomon |
|Tag(s)=EMCA; co-operative action; embodiment; distributed cognition; materiality; video analysis; conversation analysis; ethnography of science; ethnomethodology | |Tag(s)=EMCA; co-operative action; embodiment; distributed cognition; materiality; video analysis; conversation analysis; ethnography of science; ethnomethodology | ||
|Key=Goodwin-Salomon2019 | |Key=Goodwin-Salomon2019 | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
|Number=2 | |Number=2 | ||
|Pages=Art. 11 | |Pages=Art. 11 | ||
| − | |URL=http:// | + | |URL=http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/3271 |
| − | |DOI=10.17169/fqs-20.2.3271 | + | |DOI=10.17169/fqs-20.2.3271 |
| − | |Abstract= | + | |Abstract=In this interview Charles (Chuck) GOODWIN not only reflects on his academic career, but also gives a fascinating and profound insight into the genesis of his own theoretical approach. On the one hand it becomes apparent that he and his spouse, Marjorie Harness GOODWIN, are among the few people who have contributed to the development of several approaches that now belong to the established canon of sociology. On the other hand GOODWIN allows a deep insight into the formation and background of a social-theoretical movement, more diverse and networked than currently visible. At the same time, he manages to introduce the more complex assumptions of his research results and theoretical conclusions. He thereby draws a line from his early work in the 1970s to this day—starting in the context of people like Gregory BATESON; working with people like Erving GOFFMAN, Gail JEFFERSON, Harvey SACKS, William LABOV and many more. It shows the creativity and openness, with which Charles GOODWIN was able to overcome the divide between theoretical schools and to thereby develop a genuine approach. In the early 1970s he already had succeeded in illuminating areas that could hardly be more topical today. |
| − | but also gives a fascinating and profound insight into the genesis of his own theoretical approach. | ||
| − | On the one hand it becomes apparent that he and his spouse, Marjorie Harness GOODWIN, are | ||
| − | among the few people who have contributed to the development of several approaches that now | ||
| − | belong to the established canon of sociology. On the other hand GOODWIN allows a deep insight | ||
| − | into the formation and background of a social-theoretical movement, more diverse and networked | ||
| − | than currently visible. At the same time, he manages to introduce the more complex assumptions of | ||
| − | his research results and theoretical conclusions. He thereby draws a line from his early work in the | ||
| − | 1970s to this day—starting in the context of people like Gregory BATESON; working with people | ||
| − | like Erving GOFFMAN, Gail JEFFERSON, Harvey SACKS, William LABOV and many more. It | ||
| − | shows the creativity and openness, with which Charles GOODWIN was able to overcome the divide | ||
| − | between theoretical schools and to thereby develop a genuine approach. In the early 1970s he | ||
| − | already had succeeded in illuminating areas that could hardly be more topical today. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 02:25, 19 January 2020
| Goodwin-Salomon2019 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Goodwin-Salomon2019 |
| Author(s) | Charles Goodwin, René Salomon |
| Title | Not being bound by what you can see now: Charles Goodwin in conversation with René Salomon |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, co-operative action, embodiment, distributed cognition, materiality, video analysis, conversation analysis, ethnography of science, ethnomethodology |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2019 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Forum: Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research |
| Volume | 20 |
| Number | 2 |
| Pages | Art. 11 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.17169/fqs-20.2.3271 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
In this interview Charles (Chuck) GOODWIN not only reflects on his academic career, but also gives a fascinating and profound insight into the genesis of his own theoretical approach. On the one hand it becomes apparent that he and his spouse, Marjorie Harness GOODWIN, are among the few people who have contributed to the development of several approaches that now belong to the established canon of sociology. On the other hand GOODWIN allows a deep insight into the formation and background of a social-theoretical movement, more diverse and networked than currently visible. At the same time, he manages to introduce the more complex assumptions of his research results and theoretical conclusions. He thereby draws a line from his early work in the 1970s to this day—starting in the context of people like Gregory BATESON; working with people like Erving GOFFMAN, Gail JEFFERSON, Harvey SACKS, William LABOV and many more. It shows the creativity and openness, with which Charles GOODWIN was able to overcome the divide between theoretical schools and to thereby develop a genuine approach. In the early 1970s he already had succeeded in illuminating areas that could hardly be more topical today.
Notes
