Difference between revisions of "Buccholz-Kachele2017"
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) m |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
|Number=3 | |Number=3 | ||
|Pages=161-178 | |Pages=161-178 | ||
| + | |URL=https://www.researchinpsychotherapy.org/index.php/rpsy/article/view/257 | ||
|DOI=10.4081/ripppo.2017.257 | |DOI=10.4081/ripppo.2017.257 | ||
|Abstract=Independent of theoretical orientation therapies of all kind are talk-in-interaction. Influential overall conceptualizations (as e.g. intervention) belong to a certain model of medicalizing the psychotherapeutic endeavor. Talk-in-interaction is the base for applying Conversation Analysis (CA) in psychotherapeutic process research. CA is a powerful tool originating from social science taking data, | |Abstract=Independent of theoretical orientation therapies of all kind are talk-in-interaction. Influential overall conceptualizations (as e.g. intervention) belong to a certain model of medicalizing the psychotherapeutic endeavor. Talk-in-interaction is the base for applying Conversation Analysis (CA) in psychotherapeutic process research. CA is a powerful tool originating from social science taking data, | ||
Latest revision as of 03:32, 26 September 2023
| Buccholz-Kachele2017 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Buccholz-Kachele2017 |
| Author(s) | Michael B. Buchholz, Horst Kächele |
| Title | From turn-by-turn to larger chunks of talk: An exploratory study in psychotherapeutic micro-processes using conversation analysis |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Psychotherapy, Metaphor analysis, Allusion, Empathy |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2017 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome |
| Volume | 30 |
| Number | 3 |
| Pages | 161-178 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.4081/ripppo.2017.257 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Independent of theoretical orientation therapies of all kind are talk-in-interaction. Influential overall conceptualizations (as e.g. intervention) belong to a certain model of medicalizing the psychotherapeutic endeavor. Talk-in-interaction is the base for applying Conversation Analysis (CA) in psychotherapeutic process research. CA is a powerful tool originating from social science taking data, hypotheses and theories from careful observing in a similar way as infant observers did. The common discovery is that conversation precedes language. Some features of infantile proto-conversation survive in adult life. CA has directed careful attention to processes like turn-taking, repair, conditional relevances, etc. in observing the rules of interaction. However, in studying psychotherapy process turn-by-turn analysis alone does not suffice. It can be completed by a new model of common ground activities and package-by-package analysis turning attention to new objects of observation in therapeutic conversation (allusions, metaphorical framing activities). We propose a methodology for both kinds of analyses based on transcribed examples from the CEMPP-Project. This exploratory designed project (Conversation analysis of empathy in Psychotherapy Process; supported by the Köhler Foundation, Germany) compared psychoanalytic, psychodynamic and cognitive-behavioral treatments in five dyads each taking transcribed sessions from the beginning, the middle phase and the end; our database includes 45 transcribed sessions.
Notes
