Difference between revisions of "Heritage2018a"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m
 
Line 2: Line 2:
 
|BibType=INCOLLECTION
 
|BibType=INCOLLECTION
 
|Author(s)=John Heritage;
 
|Author(s)=John Heritage;
|Title=Turn-initial particles in English: The cases of oh and well.
+
|Title=Turn-initial particles in English: The cases of oh and well
 
|Editor(s)=John Heritage; Marja-Leena Sorjonen;
 
|Editor(s)=John Heritage; Marja-Leena Sorjonen;
 
|Tag(s)=EMCA; sequence organization; epistemics; English; turn initiation; oh; preference; action formation; well;
 
|Tag(s)=EMCA; sequence organization; epistemics; English; turn initiation; oh; preference; action formation; well;
 
|Key=Heritage2018a
 
|Key=Heritage2018a
|Publisher=John Benjamins Publishing
+
|Publisher=John Benjamins
 
|Year=2018
 
|Year=2018
 
|Language=English
 
|Language=English
 
|Chapter=6
 
|Chapter=6
 
|Address=Amsterdam / Philadelphia
 
|Address=Amsterdam / Philadelphia
|Booktitle=Between Turn and Sequence: Turn-initial particles across languages
+
|Booktitle=Between Turn and Sequence: Turn-Initial Particles Across Languages
 
|Pages=149–184
 
|Pages=149–184
|URL=https://benjamins.com/#catalog/books/slsi.31.06her/details
+
|URL=https://benjamins.com/catalog/slsi.31.06her
|DOI=https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.31.06her
+
|DOI=10.1075/slsi.31.06her
 
|Abstract=This chapter examines the English turn-initial particles oh and well. It begins with a consideration of their distinctive usages and functions in three basic sequential positions (first, second and third), arguing that both exhibit what Schegloff (1996) terms ‘positional sensitivity’. The chapter then considers some larger contrasts between the two particles, including distinctions between epistemic (oh) and action-projecting (well) functions, forward- (well) and backward- (oh) looking orientations, and their underlying semantic characteristics.
 
|Abstract=This chapter examines the English turn-initial particles oh and well. It begins with a consideration of their distinctive usages and functions in three basic sequential positions (first, second and third), arguing that both exhibit what Schegloff (1996) terms ‘positional sensitivity’. The chapter then considers some larger contrasts between the two particles, including distinctions between epistemic (oh) and action-projecting (well) functions, forward- (well) and backward- (oh) looking orientations, and their underlying semantic characteristics.
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 05:20, 13 January 2020

Heritage2018a
BibType INCOLLECTION
Key Heritage2018a
Author(s) John Heritage
Title Turn-initial particles in English: The cases of oh and well
Editor(s) John Heritage, Marja-Leena Sorjonen
Tag(s) EMCA, sequence organization, epistemics, English, turn initiation, oh, preference, action formation, well
Publisher John Benjamins
Year 2018
Language English
City Amsterdam / Philadelphia
Month
Journal
Volume
Number
Pages 149–184
URL Link
DOI 10.1075/slsi.31.06her
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title Between Turn and Sequence: Turn-Initial Particles Across Languages
Chapter 6

Download BibTex

Abstract

This chapter examines the English turn-initial particles oh and well. It begins with a consideration of their distinctive usages and functions in three basic sequential positions (first, second and third), arguing that both exhibit what Schegloff (1996) terms ‘positional sensitivity’. The chapter then considers some larger contrasts between the two particles, including distinctions between epistemic (oh) and action-projecting (well) functions, forward- (well) and backward- (oh) looking orientations, and their underlying semantic characteristics.

Notes