Difference between revisions of "Hutchby-OReilly2010"
m (Clair-AntoineVeyrier moved page Hutchby-O’Reilly2010 to Hutchby-OReilly2010: apostrophe in title seems to be source of trouble in bibliogrphy) |
(key) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|Title=Children’s participation and the familial moral order in family therapy | |Title=Children’s participation and the familial moral order in family therapy | ||
|Tag(s)=EMCA; child–adult interaction; children’s talk; conversation analysis; family; family therapy; moral order | |Tag(s)=EMCA; child–adult interaction; children’s talk; conversation analysis; family; family therapy; moral order | ||
| − | |Key=Hutchby- | + | |Key=Hutchby-OReilly2010 |
|Year=2010 | |Year=2010 | ||
|Language=English | |Language=English | ||
Revision as of 08:56, 7 September 2018
| Hutchby-OReilly2010 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Hutchby-OReilly2010 |
| Author(s) | Ian Hutchby, Michelle O’Reilly |
| Title | Children’s participation and the familial moral order in family therapy |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, child–adult interaction, children’s talk, conversation analysis, family, family therapy, moral order |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2010 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Discourse Studies |
| Volume | 12 |
| Number | 1 |
| Pages | 49–64 |
| URL | |
| DOI | 10.1177/1461445609357406 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This article examines discourse practices surrounding children’s participation, non-participation, and the ‘moral order’ of the family in the setting of family therapy consultations. The analysis focuses on two central issues. First, the relationship between therapists’ questions, the speaker selection techniques built into those questions, and the responses produced by family members. Second, the relationship between turn-taking and the linguistic features of person deixis in disputes that emerge around children’s orientation to implicit accusations in the talk of other participants about them. The findings reveal how a familial ‘moral order’ is often at the root of how children’s competence as participants is managed by the parents, the therapist, and the children themselves.
Notes
