Difference between revisions of "Sidnell2004"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Jack Sidnell; |Title=There’s risks in everything: extreme-case formulations and accountability in inquiry testimony |Tag(s)=EMCA; acc...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| − | |Author(s)=Jack Sidnell; | + | |Author(s)=Jack Sidnell; |
|Title=There’s risks in everything: extreme-case formulations and accountability in inquiry testimony | |Title=There’s risks in everything: extreme-case formulations and accountability in inquiry testimony | ||
|Tag(s)=EMCA; accounts; evasion; extreme case formulations; law; questions and answers; turn-design; | |Tag(s)=EMCA; accounts; evasion; extreme case formulations; law; questions and answers; turn-design; | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
|Number=6 | |Number=6 | ||
|Pages=745–766 | |Pages=745–766 | ||
| − | |DOI=10.1177/ 0957926504046503 | + | |URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0957926504046503 |
| − | |Abstract= | + | |DOI=10.1177/0957926504046503 |
| − | water contamination in a small town in Ontario, Canada, this article presents | + | |Abstract=Drawing on the video record of a recent inquiry into the causes of water contamination in a small town in Ontario, Canada, this article presents an analysis of evasive strategies. The analysis focuses on the use of ‘extreme case formulations’ such as ‘there’s risks in everything’ and ‘every meeting of Cabinet or Cabinet Committee is important’ (Pomerantz, 1986; Sacks, 1995). Within the context of inquiry testimony, such formulations allowed the thenpremier of Ontario to avoid having to account for possibly blameworthy actions. |
| − | an analysis of evasive strategies. The analysis focuses on the use of ‘extreme | ||
| − | case formulations’ such as ‘there’s risks in everything’ and ‘every meeting of | ||
| − | Cabinet or Cabinet Committee is important’ (Pomerantz, 1986; Sacks, 1995). | ||
| − | Within the context of inquiry testimony, such formulations allowed the | ||
| − | |||
| − | actions. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 11:47, 31 October 2019
| Sidnell2004 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Sidnell2004 |
| Author(s) | Jack Sidnell |
| Title | There’s risks in everything: extreme-case formulations and accountability in inquiry testimony |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, accounts, evasion, extreme case formulations, law, questions and answers, turn-design |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2004 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Discourse & Society |
| Volume | 15 |
| Number | 6 |
| Pages | 745–766 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1177/0957926504046503 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Drawing on the video record of a recent inquiry into the causes of water contamination in a small town in Ontario, Canada, this article presents an analysis of evasive strategies. The analysis focuses on the use of ‘extreme case formulations’ such as ‘there’s risks in everything’ and ‘every meeting of Cabinet or Cabinet Committee is important’ (Pomerantz, 1986; Sacks, 1995). Within the context of inquiry testimony, such formulations allowed the thenpremier of Ontario to avoid having to account for possibly blameworthy actions.
Notes
