Difference between revisions of "Rintel2003"
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
|Number=1 | |Number=1 | ||
|URL=http://www.cios.org/EJCPUBLIC/013/1/01312.HTML | |URL=http://www.cios.org/EJCPUBLIC/013/1/01312.HTML | ||
| + | |Abstract=The design of Internet Relay Chat (IRC) affords for, and itself produces, non-response situations that are not possible in FTF or telephone interaction. These system-occasioned non-responses produce almost isomorphic stimuli to participant non-responses. Situations thus arise in which non-responses are interpersonally accountable despite agentive ambiguity. This study explores four intersections of participant-action and system-occasioned non-responses. An extension to Pomerantz's (1984b) 'pursuing a response' problems/solutions is proposed. The impact of IRC's design on its popularity is discussed in contrast to more recent chat systems. Suggestions are made for active and passive presence and non-response accounting features in future chat systems. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 00:42, 31 October 2019
| Rintel2003 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Rintel2003 |
| Author(s) | Sean Rintel, Jeffrey Pittam, Joan Mulholland |
| Title | Time will tell: Ambiguous non-responses on Internet Relay Chat |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Internet Relay Chat, Computer-mediated Communication, non-response, Repair |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2003 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | The Electronic Journal of Communication / La Revue Electronic de Communication |
| Volume | 13 |
| Number | 1 |
| Pages | |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
The design of Internet Relay Chat (IRC) affords for, and itself produces, non-response situations that are not possible in FTF or telephone interaction. These system-occasioned non-responses produce almost isomorphic stimuli to participant non-responses. Situations thus arise in which non-responses are interpersonally accountable despite agentive ambiguity. This study explores four intersections of participant-action and system-occasioned non-responses. An extension to Pomerantz's (1984b) 'pursuing a response' problems/solutions is proposed. The impact of IRC's design on its popularity is discussed in contrast to more recent chat systems. Suggestions are made for active and passive presence and non-response accounting features in future chat systems.
Notes
