Difference between revisions of "Raymond2000"
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Geoffrey Raymond; |Title=The voice of authority: The local accomplishment of authoritative discourse in live news broadcasts |Tag(s)=EM...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| − | |Author(s)=Geoffrey Raymond; | + | |Author(s)=Geoffrey Raymond; |
| − | |Title=The voice of authority: | + | |Title=The voice of authority: the local accomplishment of authoritative discourse in live news broadcasts |
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; News; Authority; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; News; Authority; |
|Key=Raymond2000 | |Key=Raymond2000 | ||
|Year=2000 | |Year=2000 | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|Journal=Discourse Studies | |Journal=Discourse Studies | ||
|Volume=2 | |Volume=2 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Number=3 |
| − | |URL= | + | |Pages=354–379 |
| + | |URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1461445600002003005 | ||
| + | |DOI=10.1177/1461445600002003005 | ||
|Abstract=Ever since language has been examined as a vehicle for action, scholars have been interested in its authorized use (Austin, 1962). Typically described under the rubric of `felicity conditions', the authorized use of language involves, among other conditions, the right or authority of a member to engage in, or deploy, some named action. This paper begins by examining how participants authorize the discourse of a co-interactant in one specialized setting: a live news broadcast. I argue that the successful exploitation by a reporter of his/her right to authoritatively describe a scene all are witnessing rests in part on the displayed mutual orientation of his or her co-interactants to that right through the local, contingently achieved deployment of complex discursive practices. After exploring the special case of live news broadcasts, I link this study to other studies of mass media that have explored the link between discursive practices in news broadcasts and reportorial authority. Finally, I argue that the resources I have identified have a more general provenance than live news broadcasts, and reflect on the relation between these findings and recent discussions that explore the authorized use of language. | |Abstract=Ever since language has been examined as a vehicle for action, scholars have been interested in its authorized use (Austin, 1962). Typically described under the rubric of `felicity conditions', the authorized use of language involves, among other conditions, the right or authority of a member to engage in, or deploy, some named action. This paper begins by examining how participants authorize the discourse of a co-interactant in one specialized setting: a live news broadcast. I argue that the successful exploitation by a reporter of his/her right to authoritatively describe a scene all are witnessing rests in part on the displayed mutual orientation of his or her co-interactants to that right through the local, contingently achieved deployment of complex discursive practices. After exploring the special case of live news broadcasts, I link this study to other studies of mass media that have explored the link between discursive practices in news broadcasts and reportorial authority. Finally, I argue that the resources I have identified have a more general provenance than live news broadcasts, and reflect on the relation between these findings and recent discussions that explore the authorized use of language. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 10:33, 27 October 2019
| Raymond2000 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Raymond2000 |
| Author(s) | Geoffrey Raymond |
| Title | The voice of authority: the local accomplishment of authoritative discourse in live news broadcasts |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Conversation Analysis, News, Authority |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2000 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Discourse Studies |
| Volume | 2 |
| Number | 3 |
| Pages | 354–379 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1177/1461445600002003005 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Ever since language has been examined as a vehicle for action, scholars have been interested in its authorized use (Austin, 1962). Typically described under the rubric of `felicity conditions', the authorized use of language involves, among other conditions, the right or authority of a member to engage in, or deploy, some named action. This paper begins by examining how participants authorize the discourse of a co-interactant in one specialized setting: a live news broadcast. I argue that the successful exploitation by a reporter of his/her right to authoritatively describe a scene all are witnessing rests in part on the displayed mutual orientation of his or her co-interactants to that right through the local, contingently achieved deployment of complex discursive practices. After exploring the special case of live news broadcasts, I link this study to other studies of mass media that have explored the link between discursive practices in news broadcasts and reportorial authority. Finally, I argue that the resources I have identified have a more general provenance than live news broadcasts, and reflect on the relation between these findings and recent discussions that explore the authorized use of language.
Notes
